[Chicken-users] Re: any Windows Emacs haters here?

2006-12-09 Thread Reed Sheridan
From: "Brandon J. Van Every" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [Chicken-users] any Windows Emacs haters here? To: chicken-users@nongnu.org I've had it with XEmacs, since by default it doesn't even indent my C code properly. I'm not about to chase around its stupid configuration magic invocations anym

[Chicken-users] Re: any Windows Emacs haters here?

2006-12-11 Thread Reed Sheridan
From: "Brandon J. Van Every" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reed Sheridan wrote: > > Modifying the internals of some other IDE to avoid configuring your > .emacs isn't going to save you any grief. Quite the opposite. You > could probably figure out how to get Emacs to indent your code the way > you want in

Re: [Chicken-users] Re: any Windows Emacs haters here?

2006-12-09 Thread Brandon J. Van Every
Reed Sheridan wrote: Modifying the internals of some other IDE to avoid configuring your .emacs isn't going to save you any grief. Quite the opposite. You could probably figure out how to get Emacs to indent your code the way you want in a day, at worst. But that's what's ridiculous about XE

Re: [Chicken-users] Re: any Windows Emacs haters here?

2006-12-11 Thread Brandon J. Van Every
Reed Sheridan wrote: From: "Brandon J. Van Every" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> But that's what's ridiculous about XEmacs. It should be doing that correctly out of the box. I don't mean it doesn't indent the way I want. I mean it doesn't indent at all. Throwing "a day" at things is the whole mentalit