Am Montag, den 11.08.2008, 09:37 -0700 schrieb Elf:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
Am Montag, den 11.08.2008, 07:28 -0700 schrieb Elf:
absolutely not.
second, your patches will flat out not work in default chicken.
B) you are fundamentally changing the
Hi all,
since there where no more responses on my last post to this thread, I
decided that it might be the best to supply a patch to this list, which
adds a procedure make-shared-parameter extending the existing
make-parameter in a compatible way. The attached diff (against svn
revision 11597)
absolutely not.
first, why will it be difficult for you to set up a clean build environment?
second, your patches will flat out not work in default chicken.
A) why are you sending a patch of the debian rules customised for your
box?
B) you are fundamentally changing the
Am Montag, den 11.08.2008, 07:28 -0700 schrieb Elf:
absolutely not.
first, why will it be difficult for you to set up a clean build environment?
Because I'll have to rebind parameterize, which is then going to be
available to eval, where it could access parameter objects, which where
created
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
Am Montag, den 11.08.2008, 07:28 -0700 schrieb Elf:
absolutely not.
first, why will it be difficult for you to set up a clean build environment?
Because I'll have to rebind parameterize, which is then going to be
available to eval, where it
