On Jan 13, 2011, at 4:11, Felix
wrote:
> From: Jim Ursetto
> Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Re: sqlite3 egg patches for chicken experimental
> branch
> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 23:16:21 -0600
>> I am wondering why milliseconds->time is deprecated in the first
>> pl
From: Jim Ursetto
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Re: sqlite3 egg patches for chicken experimental
branch
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 23:16:21 -0600
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 21:05, Thomas Chust wrote:
>> the patch replacing noop by void is fine, of course. Concerning the
>> change of t
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 21:05, Thomas Chust wrote:
> the patch replacing noop by void is fine, of course. Concerning the
> change of thread-sleep!/ms I have the same doubts as you: It should
> really be possible to sleep less than a second waiting for database
> locks, so the computation inside thr
From: Alan Post
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Re: sqlite3 egg patches for chicken experimental
branch
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 14:10:36 -0700
> On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 09:52:52PM +0100, Felix wrote:
>> I recommend not to use fixnum mode, and to use fixnum-specific
>> operators
On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 09:52:52PM +0100, Felix wrote:
> I recommend not to use fixnum mode, and to use fixnum-specific
> operators instead. It can happen too easily that a library procedure
> returns inexact results (for example for very large numbers that
> exceed fixnum range).
>
> Apologies fo
From: Thomas Chust
Subject: [Chicken-users] Re: sqlite3 egg patches for chicken experimental branch
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 04:05:44 +0100
> 2011/1/5 Alan Post :
>> noop and milliseconds->time are removed (after being deprecated) in
>> the experimental branch of chicken. The
2011/1/5 Alan Post :
> noop and milliseconds->time are removed (after being deprecated) in
> the experimental branch of chicken. The following patches allow the
> sqlite3 egg to compile against the chicken experimental branch.
>
> I'm least certain about the milliseconds-deprecate patch, as the
>
