Does require-for-syntax work with Chicken 4?
As an exercise, I was trying to define a simple define macro as follows:
(require-for-syntax 'matchable)
(define-syntax def
(lambda (x r c)
(match x
(('def (name . args) body body* ...)
`(define ,name (lambda ,args ,body ,@body*)))
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Michele Simionato
michele.simion...@gmail.com wrote:
Does require-for-syntax work with Chicken 4?
As an exercise, I was trying to define a simple define macro as follows:
(require-for-syntax 'matchable)
You want
(require-library matchable)
(import-for-syntax
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Jim Ursetto zbignie...@gmail.com wrote:
You want
(require-library matchable)
(import-for-syntax matchable)
Works like a charm, thanks. BTW, are there already libraries
marrying low level macros with matchable?
___
