Re: [Chicken-users] Spiffy bug with header/response code preservation in threads

2008-04-20 Thread Robin Lee Powell
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 04:23:57PM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: Could you try out spiffy trunk and let me know if it works for you? If it does, I'll push a new release. I thought it wasn't working, but this was about my code; my example code still breaks, but no longer due to anything

Re: [Chicken-users] Spiffy bug with header/response code preservation in threads

2008-04-19 Thread Robin Lee Powell
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 09:13:40PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote: On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 10:25:10PM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: This one's about as annoying as the content-length bug (a lot) and about as difficult to work around (quite easy, actually). Basically, if you don't explicitely

Re: [Chicken-users] Spiffy bug with header/response code preservation in threads

2008-04-03 Thread Peter Bex
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 10:25:10PM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: This one's about as annoying as the content-length bug (a lot) and about as difficult to work around (quite easy, actually). Basically, if you don't explicitely clear headers after you serve a request, *and* the client

[Chicken-users] Spiffy bug with header/response code preservation in threads

2008-03-30 Thread Robin Lee Powell
This one's about as annoying as the content-length bug (a lot) and about as difficult to work around (quite easy, actually). Basically, if you don't explicitely clear headers after you serve a request, *and* the client actually uses the same connection (i.e. curl does this), the headers never