Hi all,
I had a problem today which I already had before: when you define a
module, you cannot (use ) it unless you also (provide ) the extension:
#;1> (module foo (bar) (import chicken scheme) (define (bar) (print "bar")))
; loading /usr/pkg/lib/chicken/4/chicken.import.so ...
; loading /usr/pkg
Peter Bex scripsit:
> I had a problem today which I already had before: when you define a
> module, you cannot (use ) it unless you also (provide ) the extension:
>
> #;1> (module foo (bar) (import chicken scheme) (define (bar) (print "bar")))
> ; loading /usr/pkg/lib/chicken/4/chicken.import.so
Scripsi:
> There's a bug here, as shown by the traceback:
>
> (##core#begin (##sys#require (quote foo)) (import foo))
>
> This is an attempt to require *and then* import, but it cannot work,
> because import is a macro and does its work at macroexpansion time,
> whereas ##sys#require is a proced
I'll admit to being entirely new to this before I reply, but it looks like
##core#require-extension (compiler.scm) is calling ##sys#do-the-right-thing
(eval.scm).
##sys#do-the-right-thing is calling import. Line 1233:
`((import ,id));XXX make hygienic
I believe the attached patch m
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 02:18:09PM -0500, John Cowan wrote:
Hi John,
Thanks for your very detailed answer!
> That is because 'use' does a 'require' (which calls 'provided?', and
> if it returns #f, calls 'load'). If you define the module in this way,
> you want to use 'import' rather than 'use'
Rob Roland scripsit:
> I'll admit to being entirely new to this before I reply, but it looks like
> ##core#require-extension (compiler.scm) is calling ##sys#do-the-right-thing
> (eval.scm).
>
> ##sys#do-the-right-thing is calling import. Line 1233:
>
> `((import ,id));XXX make hygi
Peter Bex scripsit:
> My goal here is to load a file regardless of whether it was loaded by
> some bootstrap code or installed as an extension.
>
> Is there a way to do this programmatically?
Require does the job as far as mere loading is concerned, but as for
programmatic importing, you must us
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 10:13:05PM -0500, John Cowan wrote:
> Peter Bex scripsit:
>
> > My goal here is to load a file regardless of whether it was loaded by
> > some bootstrap code or installed as an extension.
> >
> > Is there a way to do this programmatically?
>
> Require does the job as far
On Tue, 5 Jan 2010 14:59:21 +0100 Peter Bex wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 10:13:05PM -0500, John Cowan wrote:
>> Peter Bex scripsit:
>>
>> > My goal here is to load a file regardless of whether it was loaded by
>> > some bootstrap code or installed as an extension.
>> >
>> > Is there a way t
Peter Bex scripsit:
> That's interesting, but what I really meant was: "is there a way to add
> directories to where USE looks for extensions?"
USE looks where REQUIRE looks, so try setting the environment variable
CHICKEN_REPOSITORY or the parameter repository-path.
--
John Cowanco...@ccil
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 05:43:40PM -0500, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
> Maybe #135 (http://www.irp.oist.jp/trac/chicken/ticket/135) is somehow
> related to what you want.
I suppose it would be, if I got it to work to that stage ;)
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of prepa
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 07:49:42PM -0500, John Cowan wrote:
> Peter Bex scripsit:
>
> > That's interesting, but what I really meant was: "is there a way to add
> > directories to where USE looks for extensions?"
>
> USE looks where REQUIRE looks, so try setting the environment variable
> CHICKEN_
12 matches
Mail list logo
