Re: [Chicken-users] Tinyclos - a bit disappointing for an ex-stklos user

2006-09-14 Thread Alex Shinn
On 9/14/06, felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/14/06, Matthew Welland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a formal reason why tinyclos can't have its own namespace for methods? Or, is it just an implementation limitation? In STklos I was used to doing the following: (define-class

[Chicken-users] Tinyclos - a bit disappointing for an ex-stklos user

2006-09-13 Thread Matthew Welland
Is there a formal reason why tinyclos can't have its own namespace for methods? Or, is it just an implementation limitation? In STklos I was used to doing the following: (define-class foo () ((bar :initform '( (define-method length ((self foo)) (length (slot-ref self 'bar))) (define a