erm, have you looked at the remote-repl egg?
fwiw, i don't see why this is an issue at all... just send quoted lists
(stringified, of course), and eval it on whichever end is desired.
-elf
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008, Shawn Rutledge wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 1:00 AM, Drake Wilson [EMAIL
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008, Shawn Rutledge wrote:
#;10 (begin (define update #f) (let ([v 'foo]) (set! update (lambda
(d s) (printf ~s was ~s~% d (eval d)) (set! d s)
#;11 (update 'v 'bar)
Error: unbound variable: v
What I'm trying to do is pass the name of a let-bound variable in to a
lambda
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:31 PM, John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shawn Rutledge scripsit:
[W]hy should I have to re-create functionality which is one of the
most basic features of Scheme (being able to look up symbols and get
values bound to them)
Actually, it isn't: Scheme has no such
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:27:18PM -0700, Shawn Rutledge wrote:
#;10 (begin (define update #f) (let ([v 'foo]) (set! update (lambda
(d s) (printf ~s was ~s~% d (eval d)) (set! d s)
#;11 (update 'v 'bar)
Error: unbound variable: v
What I'm trying to do is pass the name of a let-bound
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Peter Bex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:27:18PM -0700, Shawn Rutledge wrote:
#;10 (begin (define update #f) (let ([v 'foo]) (set! update (lambda
(d s) (printf ~s was ~s~% d (eval d)) (set! d s)
#;11 (update 'v 'bar)
Error: unbound
Quoth Shawn Rutledge [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 2008-10-23 23:54:03 -0700:
Eval only sees the top-level environment. It may be possible to use
the environments egg to construct your own environment containing v.
I thought of that, but also thought there must be a generic Scheme way
to do this.
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 1:00 AM, Drake Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoth Shawn Rutledge [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 2008-10-23 23:54:03 -0700:
Eval only sees the top-level environment. It may be possible to use
the environments egg to construct your own environment containing v.
I thought of
Quoth Shawn Rutledge [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 2008-10-24 10:20:12 -0700:
Right that's the usual pattern. But I'm trying to call it remotely.
A client REPL opens an SSH connection to a server and starts a server
REPL. Each of them evaluates what the other sends. So if the server
sends
(let
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Drake Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you mean later as in after the let, the v doesn't exist anymore.
Well it's not going to be garbage-collected if an accessor is created
inside the let, which can do destructive operations on it later.
Here's a way to make
Shawn Rutledge scripsit:
A client REPL opens an SSH connection to a server and starts a server
REPL. Each of them evaluates what the other sends. So if the server
sends
(let ([v (make-thing)])
...)
and the client evaluates it, then later the server wants to ask the
client to do any
Quoth Shawn Rutledge [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 2008-10-24 12:02:52 -0700:
Oh, maybe you are right though: maybe the symbol 'v doesn't exist
anymore, because in the counter example, the accessor only needs to
access the number to which 'v was bound. So it can replace the symbol
with a reference to
#;10 (begin (define update #f) (let ([v 'foo]) (set! update (lambda
(d s) (printf ~s was ~s~% d (eval d)) (set! d s)
#;11 (update 'v 'bar)
Error: unbound variable: v
What I'm trying to do is pass the name of a let-bound variable in to a
lambda defined within the let context, in order to tell
12 matches
Mail list logo
