Hello,
I have written a set of Makefiles for building some Lisps,
including Chicken, on OpenWRT, and would like to know if some
Chicken users would be interested in testing.
Here:
https://gitlab.com/jpellegrini/openwrt-packages
Please tell me if it works for you!
Thanks,
J.
__
I think this is exactly what I wanted!
thank u for ur help!
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/81/808386/p215-mccarthy.pdf?ip=198.209.225.227&id=808386&acc=ACTIVE%20SERVICE&key=F82E6B88364EF649%2EEA777AEEAA51B01B%2E4D4702B0C3E38B35%2E4D4702B0C3E38B35&CFID=999374817&CFTOKEN=78744412&__acm__=1509128711_9f195cf9fe92408377c1edaff75b3e69
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 a
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 05:35:32PM +0800, Jinx wrote:
>
> the Paper is about 2-3 pages long, at least can be downloaded on
> the internet for free in pdf,
>
> the content is on how to constuct lisp from several axioms, more in
> a math paper fashion.
>
> the paper is a late time working paper M
the Paper is about 2-3 pages long, at least can be downloaded on
the internet for free in pdf,
the content is on how to constuct lisp from several axioms, more in
a math paper fashion.
the paper is a late time working paper McCarthy, not the
"Recursive Functions of ... Machine, Part I" , there
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 5:53 AM, Christian Kellermann
wrote:
>
> I would like to ask some help for finding the right fmt expression to
> print entries formatted as like this:
>
> 2015-11-20 foo bar baz... Some·Label Some·Other·Label
> -123.23-100.00
>
Hi!
I would like to ask some help for finding the right fmt expression to
print entries formatted as like this:
2015-11-20 foo bar baz... Some·Label Some·Other·Label
-123.23-100.00
Yet·Another·Label
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 7:25 PM, Evan Hanson wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> My guess is that because you don't close the output port before waiting
> for results, dot(1) sits there waiting for more input and your procedure
> appears to hang.
>
Ah, yes, dot is not processing the input until it is read in i
Hi Matt,
My guess is that because you don't close the output port before waiting
for results, dot(1) sits there waiting for more input and your procedure
appears to hang.
I'd try closing `oup` once you've written your graph to the process, for
example by making the thunk you use for the "dot writ
I'm trying to use the posix process call to run the graphviz dot program,
hand it some input data and collect the output. I'm not able to figure out
how to correctly use process to do this. My code is below. Any hints would
be much appreciated.
(define (tests:run-dot indat outtype) ;; outtype is p
I’ve documented the family parameter to udp-open-socket and fleshed out the
examples (including a daytime client/server pair).
Hope this helps.
http://api.call-cc.org/doc/udp6
Jim
> On Feb 17, 2015, at 03:56, Scott McCoid wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> This completely worked for me, thanks for the
Hi Jim,
This completely worked for me, thanks for the clear example! I didn't even
think to check if (udp-open-socket) also accepted extra arguments.
Thanks again!
Scott
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:17 AM, Jim Ursetto wrote:
> Scott,
>
> This works on my system (10.10.2, CHICKEN 4.8.0.6). Note t
Scott,
This works on my system (10.10.2, CHICKEN 4.8.0.6). Note the undocumented
argument to udp-open-socket… not sure what I was thinking.
If this works for you, I will document the argument and add the example to the
wiki.
(use udp6)
(define s (udp-open-socket 'inet6))
(udp-bind! s "::" 13
Hi Christian!
Thanks for the quick help and netcat tip. I was able to send from my script
and receive with netcat (for example: *nc -u -6 -l 8000*) without any
problems. (sending to port 8000 in my script)
I've tried doing the reverse situation, where I receive on the script side
and send using n
Hi Scott!
Scott McCnoid writes:
> I'm reasonably new to chicken-scheme (and scheme in general), and I'm
> having trouble with the udp6 (and likewise, socket) eggs. I'm trying to run
> the example code, but the connection is always refused.
>
> *Error: (socket-receive!) cannot read from socket -
Hello,
I'm reasonably new to chicken-scheme (and scheme in general), and I'm
having trouble with the udp6 (and likewise, socket) eggs. I'm trying to run
the example code, but the connection is always refused.
*Error: (socket-receive!) cannot read from socket - Connection refused:
#*
I looked int
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 03:39:31AM -0600, Alex Stuart wrote:
> Greetings,
>
Hi there!
> I want to append the latter list to the former and pass it to a second
> callback function. I'm trying to do this by setting the cdr of the first
> list's last pair (using C_set_block_item). However, the appe
Greetings,
I need some help. I am calling a foreign C function that calls back to
Scheme (using CHICKEN_apply). The callback returns a list as its value.
The foreign function creates a static reference to this list (using
CHICKEN_new_gc_root). The foreign function then creates a different list
on
To clarify, by "do not reply to this email" I meant "do not reply to the
list" but instead email me directly at estifo...@gmail.com. I'm trying to
be a good citizen here and not clog up the lists with email that will annoy
people.
Also, I need someone with illustration and or image skills.
On Tu
Hi,
This is a long shot and I apologize in advance for any time wasted and for
cross-posting to unrelated groups. Please: DO NOT reply to this email.
I have been working on a project that I believe will do a good job in
raising awareness of alternative voting systems. Initially I want to
contrast
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 09:36:48PM +0100, Peter Bex wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 01:22:40PM -0701, Alan Post wrote:
> > I'd like to rewrite this macro as an implicit renaming
> > macro, which seems to require that I traverse form and
> > insert (inject arg1) wherever I find arg1, and to do
> >
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 01:22:40PM -0701, Alan Post wrote:
> I'd like to rewrite this macro as an implicit renaming
> macro, which seems to require that I traverse form and
> insert (inject arg1) wherever I find arg1, and to do
> the same for arg2.
Hi Alan,
Actually, you only need to inject the a
I have a routine with several input arguments and one
output argument. I want to write a macro to wrap my
output argument such that I can pass the results of
my input arguments to my output argument. (See below)
I have this working with an explicit renaming macro,
but this is overkill. I could
* Pedro Melendez [130605 17:48]:
> Hey Dan,
>
> What's the preferred method to ask? I didn't know about the IRC channel and
> now I am dubious what would be better if asking over there or using the
> email list...
I'd say most general questions and newbie questions can be answered
by the #chicke
Hey Dan,
What's the preferred method to ask? I didn't know about the IRC channel and
now I am dubious what would be better if asking over there or using the
email list...
Cheers,
Pedro.
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Dan Leslie wrote:
> Feel free to ask questions in the IRC channel, #chick
Feel free to ask questions in the IRC channel, #chicken on irc.freenode.net
-Dan
On 6/5/2013 7:07 AM, nehal singhal wrote:
Hi,
I am a newbie to chicken.Can i get some aid as to how to start
coding through chicken. I was recently learning racket and also have
know-how of Python-2.6.
Plea
Hi,
On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 16:07:56 +0200 nehal singhal
wrote:
>I am a newbie to chicken.Can i get some aid as to how to start
> coding through chicken. I was recently learning racket and also have
> know-how of Python-2.6.
>Please guide a little.
Welcome.
There's the "Getting started" ch
Hi, Nehal--
Have you seen the "Chicken for Python programmers" tutorial?
http://wiki.call-cc.org/chicken-for-python-programmers
That would be a good place to start. Then if you are still unsure how
to proceed, you will probably get more help if you ask more specific
questions.
Best of luck with
Hi,
I am a newbie to chicken.Can i get some aid as to how to start
coding through chicken. I was recently learning racket and also have
know-how of Python-2.6.
Please guide a little.
regards,
Nehal Singhal.
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-u
I'm trying to port the zmq egg from using zmq 2.2 to 3.2.2 and I'm not
making very good progress. I'm hoping someone can provide some insight.
Attached is the modified zmq egg code and a test case that exercises zmq in
the way I'm using it in my application.
the problem
I get "Resource te
* Toby Thain [111009 23:05]:
> On 08/10/11 8:27 AM, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
> >>Did you build a boot chicken for bootstrapping? Note that you will need a
> >>chicken installed for this.
> >>
> >>$ gmake PLATFORM=bsd boot-chicken
> >>$ gmake PLATFORM=bsd CHICKEN=./chicken-boot
> >>$ gmake PLATFORM=bs
On 08/10/11 8:27 AM, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
Did you build a boot chicken for bootstrapping? Note that you will need a
chicken installed for this.
$ gmake PLATFORM=bsd boot-chicken
$ gmake PLATFORM=bsd CHICKEN=./chicken-boot
$ gmake PLATFORM=bsd install
I have put up a little tutorial on the wiki
> Did you build a boot chicken for bootstrapping? Note that you will need a
> chicken installed for this.
>
> $ gmake PLATFORM=bsd boot-chicken
> $ gmake PLATFORM=bsd CHICKEN=./chicken-boot
> $ gmake PLATFORM=bsd install
>
> I have put up a little tutorial on the wiki for this here
> http://wiki.ca
Hi Vitaly!
* Vitaly Magerya [111008 00:06]:
> Hi, folks. I'm trying to build the latest git sources (I've got 4.7.0
> installed); the build proceeds for a while and then fails like this:
Did you build a boot chicken for bootstrapping? Note that you will need a
chicken installed for this.
$ gma
Hi, folks. I'm trying to build the latest git sources (I've got 4.7.0
installed); the build proceeds for a while and then fails like this:
$ gmake PLATFORM=bsd
...
chicken setup-api.scm [...] -output-file setup-api.c
Syntax error (import): cannot import from undefined module
From: William Tarimo
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Help using Chicken in Windows 7
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 14:32:15 -0400
> Hello All,
> Thanks for the reply. I'm using Windows 7 32 bit machine. I reinstalled
> Mingw (mingw-get-inst-20110530.exe) from the new link, thanks. But I c
William Tarimo scripsit:
> Hello All, Thanks for the reply. I'm using Windows 7 32 bit machine. I
> reinstalled Mingw (mingw-get-inst-20110530.exe) from the new link,
> thanks. But I can't use the compiler or compile anything, I have
> attached a screenshot of the interpreter window, assuming I'm
I know little about Chicken, but I would imagine you need to call csc at the
cmd prompt, not within Chicken itself.
--- On Fri, 7/8/11, William Tarimo wrote:
From: William Tarimo
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Help using Chicken in Windows 7
To: "Steve Graham"
Cc: chicken-users@nongn
Hello All,
Thanks for the reply. I'm using Windows 7 32 bit machine. I reinstalled
Mingw (mingw-get-inst-20110530.exe) from the new link, thanks. But I can't
use the compiler or compile anything, I have attached a screenshot of the
interpreter window, assuming I'm supposed to run the compiler from
When I tried to compile (Win 7-64), I also had problems. Turned out that my
copy of mingw did not contain gcc.
Steve
On Thu Jul 7th, 2011 11:26 AM EDT William Tarimo wrote:
>Hello Chicken Users,
>I have been trying to use Chicken to compile Scheme programs to C, but the
>compiler isn't working
Hi William,
I have corrected the link on the chicken-iup page to point to
http://mingw.org, is this where you downloaded mingw from?
At exactly what stage did compilation fail and are you able to run the
interpreter? Does (load "example.scm") work? Are you able to compile a small
C program with m
Hello Chicken Users,
I have been trying to use Chicken to compile Scheme programs to C, but the
compiler isn't working for me.
I followed the installation procedures at
http://www.kiatoa.com/cgi-bin/chicken-iup/home to install Mingw and
chicken-iup,
I couldn't find Mingw on the page so I search els
OK, I also noticed David Murray's suggestion after I sent my previous email
(on Sat eve) --
about 64 vs 32 bit issue.
Now,
** from the src of 4.7.0
** using David Murray's 'make install PLATFORM=macosx ARCH=x86-64
==> it compiled ok !!
and (import chicken) gives NO segmentation fa
I downloaded 4.7.0.tar
and when I built I got the following error:
sudo make PLATFORM=macosx
Password:
...
make -f ./Makefile.macosx CONFIG= all
gcc -c apply-hack.x86.S -o apply-hack.x86.o
apply-hack.x86.S:35:suffix or operands invalid for `call'
make[1]: *** [apply-hack.x86.o] Error 1
make: **
On Jun 18, Christian Kellermann scribed:
> * HP Wei [110618 03:53]:
> >
> > Machine: iMac Mac OS X 10.6.7
> >
> > I installed chicken by the following command:
> >
> > sudo port install chicken
I have no problem building chicken from sources on OS X 10.6.7. You need
XCode installed and this wor
* HP Wei [110618 03:53]:
>
> Machine: iMac Mac OS X 10.6.7
>
> I installed chicken by the following command:
>
> sudo port install chicken
>
> -
>
> The resulting csc is used to compile the (print "hello") successfully.
>
> csi can also be invoked ok.
> (ver
Machine: iMac Mac OS X 10.6.7
I installed chicken by the following command:
sudo port install chicken
-
The resulting csc is used to compile the (print "hello") successfully.
csi can also be invoked ok.
(version 4.4.0) macosx-unix-gnu-x86-64 [ 64 bit manyarg
2011/3/21 Patrick Li :
> [...]
> transform:
> (temp (a b c) do-this do-that do-other)
> to:
> (do (do-this a b c some-more-args)
> (do-that a b c some-more-args)
> (do-other a b c some-more-args))
> The dot trick doesn't work in this circumstance.
> [...]
Hello Patrick,
in that case I'm a
Hi Thomas,
Your solution does in fact do what I was asking for. The example I gave was
just a simplified version of what I want to do. Sorry for being unclear. The
following is closer to what I actually need to accomplish:
transform:
(temp (a b c) do-this do-that do-other)
to:
(do (do-this a b c
2011/3/21 Patrick Li :
> [...]
> I'm trying to write a macro that will tranform:
> (temp (a b c) do-this do-that do-other)
> into this:
> (do (do-this a b c)
> (do-that a b c)
> (do-other a b c))
> [...]
Try this:
(define-syntax temp
(syntax-rules ()
[(temp args command ...)
(d
Hello everyone,
I'm trying to write the following macro using the syntax-rules system, and
got stuck trying to figure out the ellipsis. Would someone mind giving me a
hand with this? I really appreciate it.
I'm trying to write a macro that will tranform:
(temp (a b c) do-this do-that do-other)
i
Peter Bex scripsit:
> begin-also-for-syntax? begin-for-both-environments? :)
I like this idea best, though better names are needed.
Personally, I would prefer begin-utriusque-phasidis, but
I can see why people might not like that.
--
As you read this, I don't want you to feel John Cowan
so
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 01:59:47PM +0100, Felix wrote:
> > This imports module-a (which can be internal and nobody has to know it's
> > there) both for syntax and normally, and then re-exports the convenience
> > function.
> >
> > Yes, this is ugly.
>
> Well, is it?
Not having an alternative doe
From: Taylor Venable
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Help solving this phasing problem.
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 18:04:13 -0500
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 16:51, Peter Bex wrote:
>> This imports module-a (which can be internal and nobody has to know it's
>> there) both for synt
From: Peter Bex
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Help solving this phasing problem.
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 22:51:05 +0100
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 04:35:23PM -0500, Patrick Li wrote:
>>
>> I have a *very* ugly workaround right now.
>> I define the convenience function twic
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 16:51, Peter Bex wrote:
> This imports module-a (which can be internal and nobody has to know it's
> there) both for syntax and normally, and then re-exports the convenience
> function.
Pardon the interruption, but I wanted to check for my own
understanding: is import-for-
Thanks Peter. That's perfectly good enough. As long as I'm not repeating
myself and it's transparent to the user, I can live with it. You've been
very helpful.
-Patrick
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Peter Bex wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 04:35:23PM -0500, Patrick Li wrote:
> >
> > I hav
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 04:35:23PM -0500, Patrick Li wrote:
>
> I have a *very* ugly workaround right now.
> I define the convenience function twice. Once normally. And again within a
> begin-for-syntax form.
You can do the same trick as before:
(module module-a (convenience-function)
(import
Hello everyone,
I'm creating a module that exports two things, a macro and a function. The
definition of the macro happens to require the use of the function. I am
having problems creating this module. The defined macro cannot access the
function.
--Example
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 01:26:40AM -0600, Evan E. wrote:
> Using easyffi, I've declared the foreign type and procedure. TCMAP is
> a hash map struct, tcmapget returns a value for a given key from the
> map object:
>
> ___declare(type, "MAP;(nonnull-c-pointer \"TCMAP\");tc-map-ptr")
> const void *t
This may be beyond the scope of this mailing list, but here goes. I'm
working on extending the tokyocabinet egg to include more
functionality. It's gone well, but I'm running into an issue with one
type/procedure.
Using easyffi, I've declared the foreign type and procedure. TCMAP is
a hash map st
I have some code which currently uses syntax-case, and because it has
nested macro definitions, it needs the (... ...) hack.
When we migrate to Chicken 4.0, we'll need to convert that to the
superior srfi 46 choose-your-own-ellipsis method. What I'd like to do,
to facilitate migrate, is write a
Toby Butzon wrote:
On Jan 22, 2008 2:41 PM, Kon Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You might want to contact [EMAIL PROTECTED], the author. I don't know
if he is active with egg maintenance though.
I'm an active lurker... :)
Any of those options is fine by me -- if a patch comes my way
On Jan 22, 2008 2:41 PM, Kon Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You might want to contact [EMAIL PROTECTED], the author. I don't know
> if he is active with egg maintenance though.
I'm an active lurker... :)
Any of those options is fine by me -- if a patch comes my way, I'll
make sure it gets in
On Jan 22, 2008, at 2:29 PM, Jean-Philippe Theberge wrote:
OK, I keep in mind that you can easily and succesfully modify an
egg you had never used.
Sorry, not sure what you mean. A compliment? ;-)
I think this should be added to the mysql egg. I can provide a diff
or add it myself to the
OK, I keep in mind that you can easily and succesfully modify an egg you
had never used.
I think this should be added to the mysql egg. I can provide a diff or
add it myself to the egg if I am provided with a repository access.
Thanks a lot!
--
JP Theberge
Kon Lovett wrote:
On Jan 22, 20
On Jan 22, 2008, at 6:42 AM, Jean-Philippe Theberge wrote:
Hi,
I am having some trouble with the mysql egg mostly die to my
misunderstanding of c-pointers
With the egg you get data either by index or by name. What I would
like is more something like this example from the mysql-api
doc
Hi,
I am having some trouble with the mysql egg mostly die to my
misunderstanding of c-pointers
With the egg you get data either by index or by name. What I would like
is more something like this example from the mysql-api documentation
unsigned int num_fields;
unsigned int i;
MYSQL_FIELD
I dont know how this (very stale) post took so long to arrive to the
users list but this bug has already been fixed by felix in the svn
version of chicken so please disregard...
On Nov 23, 2007, at 11:19 AM, Rick Taube wrote:
OK i managed to trigger the crash using the Debug version of
c
OK i managed to trigger the crash using the Debug version of chicken.
Here is the trace in case anything is jumping out this is with
Chicken init: heap=50 stack=64000.
Date/Time: 2007-11-23 11:15:03.020 -0600
OS Version: 10.4.11 (Build 8S165)
Report Version: 4
Command: Grace
P
On Nov 23, 2007 2:20 PM, Rick Taube <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > - Try to run with different stack-sizes. The stack-allocation pattern
>
>
> I noticed yesterday that if i change heap size 4x larger than default
> i cant seem to trigger the crash. but when the bug happens there is
> no message a
On Nov 23, 2007, at 5:32 AM, felix winkelmann wrote:
- Try to run with different stack-sizes. The stack-allocation pattern
of an application will greatly influence the frequency and point of
GCs taking place, so sometimes changing the stack size ("-:s")
will change the pattern and make it
ok I switched to the latest chicken in trunk that i compiled with
debuggin like this:
make PLATFORM=macosx DEBUGBUILD=1
sudo make PLATFORM=maxosx install
then I ran my app with
heap=50
stack=64000
C_heap_size_is_fixed = 1;
and it didnt crashed in 15 t
thanks for the help, felix! i found a fairly reliable way of
triggering the bug yesterday, unfortunatly when i trigger it the only
way to recover is to literally reboot my machine, kill simply wont
kill the app that point, i cant even log out!
im using chicken 2.731, ill switch to trunk and
Hi, Rick!
In the moment I'm pretty clueless about what might go wrong here,
but I can give you a few tips that perhaps help us find the cause of
this trouble:
- Is storage consumption constant (top(1)) over a longer run?
- Try to run with a fixed heap ("-:h..." runtime options, enter "-:?"
to
Help! Im having an intermittent crash that Im fairlt sure is happing
in gc under a callback into ChickenScheme. Ive spent several days
trying to debug it without any luck. Ive included the crash report,
the Thread 3 is my dedicated Scheme thread where the crash is
happening. I am hoping th
Kon Lovett wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I need the "config.h" files produced by PCRE 7.4
(ftp://ftp.csx.cam.ac.uk/pub/software/programming/pcre/) 'configure
--enable-unicode-properties' from the following OS:
Solaris 9Sparc
NetBDSPowerPC & x86-64
Hallo,
On 9/24/07, Kon Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I need the "config.h" files produced by PCRE 7.4 (ftp://
> ftp.csx.cam.ac.uk/pub/software/programming/pcre/) 'configure --enable-
> unicode-properties' from the following OS:
>
> Solaris 9 Sparc
>
> NetBDS PowerPC & x86-64
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 07:05:24AM -0700, Kon Lovett wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I need the "config.h" files produced by PCRE 7.4 (ftp://
> ftp.csx.cam.ac.uk/pub/software/programming/pcre/) 'configure --enable-
> unicode-properties' from the following OS:
>
> NetBDSPowerPC & x86-64
He
On 9/24/07, Kon Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need the "config.h" files produced by PCRE 7.4 (ftp://
> ftp.csx.cam.ac.uk/pub/software/programming/pcre/) 'configure --enable-
> unicode-properties' from the following OS:
I've been meaning to add Solaris 10/SPARC to the "portability" list (a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I need the "config.h" files produced by PCRE 7.4 (ftp://
ftp.csx.cam.ac.uk/pub/software/programming/pcre/) 'configure --enable-
unicode-properties' from the following OS:
Solaris 9 Sparc
NetBDS PowerPC & x86-64
Linux
Yes, Thank you so much that is exactly what I was overlooking.
On Sep 23, 2007, at 8:20 AM, Thomas Christian Chust wrote:
Todd Ingalls wrote:
[...] I can generate the c file just fine (> chicken
chicken-bridge.scm -output-file chicken-bridge.cpp -quiet -no-trace
-optimize-level 2 ...)
Todd Ingalls wrote:
> [...] I can generate the c file just fine (> chicken
> chicken-bridge.scm -output-file chicken-bridge.cpp -quiet -no-trace
> -optimize-level 2 ...) and then when compiling the larger c
> executable I pass DC_EMBEDDED and everything compiles and links just
> fine. Howeve
Hi,
I have successfully gotten chicken embedded in a c executable I am
working on (actually very easy) . I can use csc to compile a dynamic
library to load into the embedded chicken to extend functionality. In
the end what I was hoping to do was to generate a .c file using
chicken which co
Hi Felix and folks,
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 02:07:04 +0200 "felix winkelmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The time has come again, where I'm getting down on my knees
> humbly begging for help: keeping the egg repository in shape
> currently takes too much of the little time I have. I want to get a n
i'd be happy to put the time in if we can discuss it a bit more. i already
have ~80% of the eggs installed locally so its to my benefit as well. :)
-elf
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, felix winkelmann wrote:
Hello, everybody.
The time has come again, where I'm getting down on my knees
humbly begging
Hello, everybody.
The time has come again, where I'm getting down on my knees
humbly begging for help: keeping the egg repository in shape
currently takes too much of the little time I have. I want to get a new
release out, but the whole build situation and the texinfo manual
integration makes thi
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 03:42:38PM -0800, Kon Lovett wrote:
>
> (and-let*
> ([(begin (display "foo.\n") #t)]
> [(= 2 1)]
> [(begin (display "bar.\n") #t)] )
> (begin
> (display "Still here.\n")))
>
> You forgot the enclosing braces for each sub-form. ('[...]' is not
>
On Feb 3, 2007, at 2:33 PM, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
I'm trying to work from http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-2/srfi-2.html
because the Chicken site is down, and I can't make and-let* work for
me at all. I've shown two attempts below.
In the chicken source, in csi.scm, there's:
(and-let* ([(fx>=
I'm trying to work from http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-2/srfi-2.html
because the Chicken site is down, and I can't make and-let* work for
me at all. I've shown two attempts below.
In the chicken source, in csi.scm, there's:
(and-let* ([(fx>= a len)]
[o (fxmod len 16)]
[(not
On 5/16/06, Hans Bulfone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi,
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 11:59:09PM -0400, Jim Miller wrote:
> I'm trying to least expensive way to wrap a C function into scheme. The
> following is the C interface to the function I need:
>
> typedef long int integer;
> typedef float real
hi,
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 11:59:09PM -0400, Jim Miller wrote:
> I'm trying to least expensive way to wrap a C function into scheme. The
> following is the C interface to the function I need:
>
> typedef long int integer;
> typedef float real;
>
> int gtd6_(integer *iyd, real *sec, real *alt,
I'm trying to least expensive way to wrap a C function into
scheme. The following is the C interface to the function I need:
typedef long int integer;
typedef float real;
int gtd6_(integer *iyd, real *sec, real *alt, real *glat, real *glong,
real *stl, real *f107a, real *f107, real *ap, integer
This email addresses a problem that is unique to a particular Windows
XP installation. If you have no interest in this, then stop reading now.
I normally don't submit this kind of stuff, but I am stuck and need some ideas.
My hope is that someone who understands Windows compilation and
shared libr
> Since funccall may trigger a garbage collection, the value func in
> your run procedure may not be valid, once a GC occurred. [...]
>
> Here is an alternative version:
>
> (use format)
>
> (define-external (funccall (scheme-object func)) void (func))
>
> (define run
> (foreign-callback-lam
On 5/7/05, Alejandro Forero Cuervo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> Some of my code that involved calling Scheme code from C recently
> started crashing (probably because the input it handles grew
> significantly). After investigation, I managed to isolate the error;
> the following pro
Hello.
Some of my code that involved calling Scheme code from C recently
started crashing (probably because the input it handles grew
significantly). After investigation, I managed to isolate the error;
the following program reproduces it:
;--- begin ---
(use format)
(define-external (funccal
> > Still, I think (load) should produce a more detailed output. :)
>
> Absolutely. Ahem, can you tell me what you did wrong, so that I can
> figure out what to detect and show in the error message?
I had left a â(declare (unit foo))â in the file. *blush*
Sorry I took so long to reply.
Alejo.
h
On 4/18/05, Alejandro Forero Cuervo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Any ideas on what could be wrong? Perhaps (load) should produce a
> > more detailed output explaining why it failed?
>
> Ack, nevermind; it was a stupid error on my part.
>
> Still, I think (load) should produce a more detailed o
> Any ideas on what could be wrong? Perhaps (load) should produce a
> more detailed output explaining why it failed?
Ack, nevermind; it was a stupid error on my part.
Still, I think (load) should produce a more detailed output. :)
Thanks.
Alejo.
http://bachue.com/alejo
---=( Comunidad de Usu
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
