On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 10:00:09PM +0200, felix winkelmann wrote:
> I'm waiting for the next bug. But basically, this thing is getting
> better and better. I really recommend everybody to give it a try.
Seconded. I'm using it full-time now and it's great.
> Programming with modules catches many
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 9:23 AM, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:38 PM, Jim Ursetto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 4:39 AM, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I have tried to improve the usability of the module system and e
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:38 PM, Jim Ursetto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 4:39 AM, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I have tried to improve the usability of the module system and exported
>> macro definitions now fully close over their lexical environment.
>
>
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 4:39 AM, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have tried to improve the usability of the module system and exported
> macro definitions now fully close over their lexical environment.
Does this work for imported bindings as well? For example, I imported
begin0 fr
Hi!
I have tried to improve the usability of the module system and exported
macro definitions now fully close over their lexical environment. Now modules
and indirect exports work, but, alas, unfortunately, hygienic macros break now
inside modules, due to some unidentified problem. I'm working on
