Re: [Chicken-users] import libraries

2008-07-28 Thread felix winkelmann
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Hans Bulfone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: so, if one wants to make an egg that is also statically linkable, one should still just compile the import lib to an .so (with the host compiler) as it is only used at compile-time and is not useful as .o ? That's correct.

Re: [Chicken-users] import libraries

2008-07-27 Thread Hans Bulfone
hi, On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 10:21:29PM +0200, felix winkelmann wrote: On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Hans Bulfone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi, i don't understand import libraries fully. is it useful to generate one if a module doesn't export syntax? The import library contains the

Re: [Chicken-users] import libraries

2008-07-26 Thread felix winkelmann
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Hans Bulfone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi, i don't understand import libraries fully. is it useful to generate one if a module doesn't export syntax? The import library contains the compile-time information and registers the module. The advantage is that this

[Chicken-users] import libraries

2008-07-25 Thread Hans Bulfone
hi, i don't understand import libraries fully. is it useful to generate one if a module doesn't export syntax? also, when i generate one for my mpd-client module, it starts with (eval '(import scheme (only chicken ...) ...)) which is the import declaration of my module. doesn't that cause