[Chicken-users] ncurses egg build failure

2009-05-24 Thread Matt Gushee
Hi, all-- I am trying to install the current (4.0) ncurses egg on Linux (2 different Linux boxes, one running Arch Linux, the other Slackware 12, both reasonably up-to-date systems), and I get the following on both systems: bash-3.2$ chicken-install ncurses retrieving ... connecting to host

Re: [Chicken-users] ncurses egg build failure

2009-05-24 Thread Peter Bex
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 12:38:35PM -0600, Matt Gushee wrote: Hi, all-- I am trying to install the current (4.0) ncurses egg on Linux (2 different Linux boxes, one running Arch Linux, the other Slackware 12, both reasonably up-to-date systems), and I get the following on both systems:

Re: [Chicken-users] ncurses egg build failure

2009-05-24 Thread Andri Möll
Hello, I encountered the same issue a few days ago. Sjamaan from #chicken recommended upgrading to the SVN version. If after upgrading the compilation stumbles upon a missing binding of 'err', replace (define ERR err) with (define ERR ERR_) in one of the ncurses-egg's source files. Andri On

Re: [Chicken-users] ncurses egg build failure

2009-05-24 Thread Peter Bex
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 09:47:50PM +0300, Andri Möll wrote: Hello, I encountered the same issue a few days ago. Sjamaan from #chicken recommended upgrading to the SVN version. If after upgrading the compilation stumbles upon a missing binding of 'err', replace (define ERR err) with (define

Re: [Chicken-users] ncurses egg build failure

2009-05-24 Thread Matt Gushee
Peter Bex wrote: On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 12:38:35PM -0600, Matt Gushee wrote: I am trying to install the current (4.0) ncurses egg on Linux (2 It's a bug in Chicken 4.0.0. Try updating your Chicken to trunk, the bug was fixed a while ago. Thanks, I'm trying that. One question, though:

Re: [Chicken-users] ncurses egg build failure

2009-05-24 Thread Peter Bex
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 01:11:12PM -0600, Matt Gushee wrote: It's a bug in Chicken 4.0.0. Try updating your Chicken to trunk, the bug was fixed a while ago. Thanks, I'm trying that. One question, though: when performing a minor upgrade like this, is it necessary (or a good idea) to

module indentation. (was Re: [Chicken-users] ncurses egg)

2009-05-08 Thread Anthony Carrico
Jim Ursetto wrote: 2009/5/4 Anthony Carrico acarr...@memebeam.org: I didn't indent the module (this will make it easier to check my work with svn diff). It seems that it is useful not to indent the module body, as definitions aligned at left works better with emacs and scheme-complete. So

Re: [Chicken-users] ncurses egg

2009-05-05 Thread Jim Ursetto
2009/5/4 Anthony Carrico acarr...@memebeam.org: I didn't indent the module (this will make it easier to check my work with svn diff). It seems that it is useful not to indent the module body, as definitions aligned at left works better with emacs and scheme-complete. So that is perfectly fine.