Re: [Chicken-users] nondescript eggs

2008-02-27 Thread felix winkelmann
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Daishi Kato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > swt should be fine if jni works well, > but it's not tested and I'm not going to maintain it. > > On the other hand, I would like to continue to develop > wxchicken, which is not complete yet at all, Ok, I'll lea

Re: [Chicken-users] nondescript eggs

2008-02-25 Thread Daishi Kato
Hi, swt should be fine if jni works well, but it's not tested and I'm not going to maintain it. On the other hand, I would like to continue to develop wxchicken, which is not complete yet at all, but I'm currently not working on it due to time limitation. Any help would be welcome. Daishi At Su

Re: [Chicken-users] nondescript eggs

2008-02-24 Thread felix winkelmann
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 12:28 AM, Ozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Guilty. > > I've committed my statvfs and filesystem eggs. Whatever svn-fu I may have > once > > had is rusty. Can I just svn mv them into releases/3? Not sure I even have > permissions for that... > > WHAT DO I DO NOW?!?? :-)

Re: [Chicken-users] nondescript eggs

2008-02-24 Thread Ozzi
Guilty. I've committed my statvfs and filesystem eggs. Whatever svn-fu I may have once had is rusty. Can I just svn mv them into releases/3? Not sure I even have permissions for that... WHAT DO I DO NOW?!?? :-) (sorry for the dupe Felix, forgot to hit "Reply All" the first time) Felix Win

[Chicken-users] nondescript eggs

2008-02-24 Thread Felix Winkelmann
Hello! The following eggs have currently no ".meta" file and seem to be in a state of flux, or have not been implemented yet (but are registered in the repository: * binary-tree/ * dns/ * filesystem/ * gl-display-glx/ * gl-font/ * libapreq-mfd-parser/ * meroonet/