Re: [Chicken-users] numbers and compiler macros

2007-06-19 Thread Alex Shinn
On 6/18/07, felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Should there be bugs, or if the code generated is too big, compiler macros (which implement this feature) can be disabled via the -disable-compiler-macros option to chicken/csc. Nice! I've been wanting compiler macros for a while :)

Re: [Chicken-users] numbers and compiler macros

2007-06-19 Thread felix winkelmann
On 6/19/07, Alex Shinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/18/07, felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Should there be bugs, or if the code generated is too big, compiler macros (which implement this feature) can be disabled via the -disable-compiler-macros option to chicken/csc. Nice!

[Chicken-users] numbers and compiler macros

2007-06-18 Thread felix winkelmann
Hello! The numbers egg (1.5) now supports what is (I believe) called speculative inlining (expanding fixnum-tests in-line). If you have the newest development version of chicken (2.621), and compile a program that uses the numbers eggs with -X numbers, you should get in some cases quote