Thanks, Toby. Egg is updated.
cheers,
felix
On 10/22/06, Toby Butzon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On 10/20/06, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > > Another useful thing would be not to save duplicate lines, but it
> > > requires marginally more work than just writing this message.
> > I th
Hi,On 10/20/06, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > Another useful thing would be not to save duplicate lines, but it> > requires marginally more work than just writing this message.> I think this could be a configuration option like, if I remember
> correctly, it is in shells like GNU Bash.Right,
On 10/20/06, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Someone please patch the readline egg:
335c335
< if (gnu_readline_buf != NULL)
---
> if (gnu_readline_buf != NULL && *gnu_readline_buf != '\0')
Done. Thanks.
cheers,
felix
--
http://galinha.ucpel.tche.br:8081/blog/blog.ssp
_
> > Another useful thing would be not to save duplicate lines, but it
> > requires marginally more work than just writing this message.
> I think this could be a configuration option like, if I remember
> correctly, it is in shells like GNU Bash.
Right, but
(i) this feature needs to be programmed
Hello Dan,
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 23:55:22 -0700 (PDT) Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is anyone using the readline egg?
I use it quite frequently when I want to quickly test something
simple.
> Another useful thing would be not to save duplicate lines, but it
> requires marginally more work than
Someone please patch the readline egg:
335c335
< if (gnu_readline_buf != NULL)
---
> if (gnu_readline_buf != NULL && *gnu_readline_buf != '\0')
to avoid blank lines being saved to history. Is anyone using the readline egg?
Another useful thing would be not to save duplicate lines, b
