Just pushed 3.0 out the door. Please let me know if it isn't regnoized
as the latest version and I'll bump it up to 3.1.
And let me know if yall come across any bugs.
It introduces the following toplevel commands:
* ,rl-!!
o Similar to Bash's /!!/, it evaluates the previous line.
* ,r
Hi Alexej,
My tuppence:
On 2015-01-27 4:01, Alexej Magura wrote:
> I don't think I'll use the toplevel-command stuff after all: I can't promise
> that the toplevel symbols readline exports won't get overwritten, and I'm
> not entirely sure readline has any business providing private toplevel
> s
I don't think I'll use the toplevel-command stuff after all: I can't
promise that the toplevel symbols readline exports won't get
overwritten, and I'm not entirely sure readline has any business
providing private toplevel symbols that are only applicable to it. It
might confuse less-experienced
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 09:10:31AM +0100, Shawn Rutledge wrote:
> On 26 January 2015 at 00:02, Matt Welland wrote:
> > From http://wiki.call-cc.org/man/4/Using%20the%20interpreter the
> ,commands are called "toplevel commands" and you can define them with:
> >
> > (toplevel-command SYMBOL PROC [HE
On 26 January 2015 at 00:02, Matt Welland wrote:
> From http://wiki.call-cc.org/man/4/Using%20the%20interpreter the
,commands are called "toplevel commands" and you can define them with:
>
> (toplevel-command SYMBOL PROC [HELPSTRING])
Where does this tradition come from? Is it related somehow to
promise
that it'll use sqlite, though.
On 01/25/2015 04:02 PM, Matt Welland wrote:
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Alexej Magura <mailto:agm2...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Forgot to send my reply to the Chicken users mailing list too.
Forwarded Message ----
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Alexej Magura wrote:
>
> Forgot to send my reply to the Chicken users mailing list too.
>
> Forwarded Message Subject: Re: [Chicken-users]
> readline egg v2.0 feedback Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 14:54:09 -0700 From:
> Alexej
&g
Forgot to send my reply to the Chicken users mailing list too.
Forwarded Message
Subject:Re: [Chicken-users] readline egg v2.0 feedback
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 14:54:09 -0700
From: Alexej Magura
To: Matt Welland
Actually, after reviewing the source a little
A paranoid function seems unnecessarily complicated to me. I think it'd
be better to provide users with simple tools with which they can build
bigger/better tools that suit their needs better than any
megalathon-tool that I can provide.
On 01/25/2015 01:48 PM, Matt Welland wrote:
I'm not sure
I think that a reasonable solution would be to (1) create the history
file if it does not already exist, (2) allow users to explicitly
disable/enable history keeping at any time, (3) simplify history file
installation to include only about a line of code, (4) add an option to
either wipe the hi
I'm not sure I understand the concern. The user had to take explicit action
to enable command logging in their .csirc, something like the following:
(gnu-history-install-file-manager
(string-append
(or (getenv "HOME") ".") "/.csi.history"
Presumably if they did the research to find this an
Original Message
From: Alexej Magura
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 04:00 AM
To: chicken-users@nongnu.org
Subject: [Chicken-users] readline egg v2.0 feedback
Hi, so as the new maintainer for the readline egg I wanted to reach
out to the community and see if anybody had any h
m...@kiatoa.com scripsit:
> As a daily user of csi with readline I look forward to using your
> enhancements. If it makes sense to do I would like to see the
> behavior change for a new install, currently the user has to touch
> the ~/.csi-history (?) file before history will be kept. I'd like it
Hi Alexej,
As a daily user of csi with readline I look forward to using your enhancements.
If it makes sense to do I would like to see the behavior change for a new
install, currently the user has to touch the ~/.csi-history (?) file before
history will be kept. I'd like it if that became unne
Hi, so as the new maintainer for the readline egg I wanted to reach out
to the community and see if anybody had any hacks that they'd like to
see included in the egg or if any old maintainers have uncommitted code?
Also if you'd like to see a feature get implemented/added to the egg,
please le
15 matches
Mail list logo
