On 1/16/07, Daishi Kato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Or, since timeout for these procedures including thread-sleep! can be
a time object,
introducing time->milliseconds and milliseconds->time would be sufficient.
It's now checked into the darcs repo, here the patch:
--- old-chicken/srfi-18.scm
2007/1/15, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 1/13/07, Daishi Kato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> That was something that I could not notice either at first.
> Another issue for me is that I want to declare fixnum
> when all other procedures are fixnum arithmetic.
> So, I wished threa
On 1/16/07, Daishi Kato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sure, and done.
Thanks.
With the latter solution, we don't need thread-sleep!/ms, right?
Exactly.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org
On 1/16/07, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/16/07, Daishi Kato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> BTW, timeout is also used for thread-join!, mutex-lock! and
> mutex-unlock! in srfi-18.
> It'd be more consistent to have */ms procedures for these above.
> Or, since timeout for these p
On 1/16/07, Daishi Kato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BTW, timeout is also used for thread-join!, mutex-lock! and
mutex-unlock! in srfi-18.
It'd be more consistent to have */ms procedures for these above.
Or, since timeout for these procedures including thread-sleep! can be
a time object,
introduci
This is supposed to go the chicken ML.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Daishi Kato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jan 16, 2007 10:43 AM
Subject: Re: Re : [Chicken-users] thread-sleep! for less than a second
To: felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks a lot!
BTW, tim
On 1/13/07, Daishi Kato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
That was something that I could not notice either at first.
Another issue for me is that I want to declare fixnum
when all other procedures are fixnum arithmetic.
So, I wished thread-sleep-millis!
Any workaround for this? Maybe making a tiny
Hi,
That was something that I could not notice either at first.
Another issue for me is that I want to declare fixnum
when all other procedures are fixnum arithmetic.
So, I wished thread-sleep-millis!
Any workaround for this? Maybe making a tiny egg for this?
Daishi
On 1/13/07, minh thu <[EMAIL
2007/1/12, Kon Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Jan 12, 2007, at 1:36 PM, minh thu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Question again, my apologies ;)
>
> Is it possible to have a thread sleep some milliseconds ?
thread-sleep! (the seconds do not need to be a whole number)
Tks, I didn't see it in the chicken doc o
On Jan 12, 2007, at 1:36 PM, minh thu wrote:
Hi,
Question again, my apologies ;)
Is it possible to have a thread sleep some milliseconds ?
thread-sleep! (the seconds do not need to be a whole number)
I want to have a thread poll xlib for some events but not in tight
loop neither only ever
10 matches
Mail list logo
