[chromium-bugs] Issue 16251 in chromium: Need to implement several more functions in process util linux.

2009-07-24 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #13 on issue 16251 by craig.schlenter: Need to implement several more functions in process util linux. http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=16251 I think you are right about the GetPrivateBytes thing ... Sorry for not doing my homework properly. Looking at the windows c

[chromium-bugs] Issue 16251 in chromium: Need to implement several more functions in process util linux.

2009-07-23 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #12 on issue 16251 by joel.stan: Need to implement several more functions in process util linux. http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=16251 (agl, markus, ping?) Ok, that would be the same value as GetWorkingSetKBytes sticks in ws_usage- > private_kb (except in bytes, of

[chromium-bugs] Issue 16251 in chromium: Need to implement several more functions in process util linux.

2009-07-23 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #11 on issue 16251 by craig.schlenter: Need to implement several more functions in process util linux. http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=16251 I don't think any of other the numbers are supposed to add up to smaps Size. Size appears to be (vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start)

[chromium-bugs] Issue 16251 in chromium: Need to implement several more functions in process util linux.

2009-07-23 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #10 on issue 16251 by joel.stan: Need to implement several more functions in process util linux. http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=16251 GetWorkingSetKBytes() is parsing smaps already (that code landed yesterday). I didn't notice until now that smaps also has the show

[chromium-bugs] Issue 16251 in chromium: Need to implement several more functions in process util linux.

2009-07-23 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #9 on issue 16251 by craig.schlenter: Need to implement several more functions in process util linux. http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=16251 Maybe what you really want is /proc/self/smaps http://bmaurer.blogspot.com/2006/03/memory-usage-with-smaps.html http://linux.d

[chromium-bugs] Issue 16251 in chromium: Need to implement several more functions in process util linux.

2009-07-23 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #8 on issue 16251 by joel.stan: Need to implement several more functions in process util linux. http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=16251 Adam, Markus; I wasn't sure what we wanted to use for GetPrivateBytes(). Using codesearch, I found the following from Mozilla (wh

[chromium-bugs] Issue 16251 in chromium: Need to implement several more functions in process util linux.

2009-07-22 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Cc: mar...@chromium.org a...@chromium.org Comment #7 on issue 16251 by de...@chromium.org: Need to implement several more functions in process util linux. http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=16251 I think Joel is still trying to work on this, he just needs some

[chromium-bugs] Issue 16251 in chromium: Need to implement several more functions in process util linux.

2009-07-22 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: Available Owner: --- Comment #6 on issue 16251 by e...@chromium.org: Need to implement several more functions in process util linux. http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=16251 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message

[chromium-bugs] Issue 16251 in chromium: Need to implement several more functions in process util linux.

2009-07-22 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #5 on issue 16251 by joel.stan: Need to implement several more functions in process util linux. http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=16251 ProcessMetrics::GetPrivateBytes() is still TODO. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of th

[chromium-bugs] Issue 16251 in chromium: Need to implement several more functions in process util linux.

2009-07-22 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #4 on issue 16251 by bugdro...@chromium.org: Need to implement several more functions in process util linux. http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=16251 The following revision refers to this bug: http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=21271 -