Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 25354
Comment #8 on issue 23092 by j...@chromium.org: Thread switchboard
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=23092
Not sure exactly what you're referring to? Are you referring to when we do
manual ref
counting to ensure
Comment #9 on issue 23092 by phajdan...@chromium.org: Thread switchboard
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=23092
Manual ref counting is one thing (and it'd be really great to make it
easier), but I was
thinking about some parts of code which are harder to follow because they
Comment #10 on issue 23092 by j...@chromium.org: Thread switchboard
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=23092
How do you see these scenarios being simplified?
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this
Comment #11 on issue 23092 by phajdan...@chromium.org: Thread switchboard
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=23092
Well, I'm not sure. I can describe in more detail what I think makes them
harder to
understand, and maybe you will have some idea.
A frequent pattern seems to be
Comment #12 on issue 23092 by da...@chromium.org: Thread switchboard
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=23092
Maybe CallbackT could help for those cases. It might be nice to
structure more code
to use it for the return callback.
It would probably be helpful to encapsulate
Updates:
Cc: j...@chromium.org
Labels: -Size-Medium
Comment #7 on issue 23092 by phajdan...@chromium.org: Thread switchboard
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=23092
jam, this sounds great! Feel free to close this bug as a duplicate etc.
By the way, I was also
Comment #4 on issue 23092 by phajdan...@chromium.org: Thread switchboard
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=23092
It wouldn't fail silently. The caller would receive a bool success value,
or possibly
even an error code. When I hear stories about jumping through other threads
