[chromium-bugs] Issue 3772 in chromium: Distributed reliability test failures with NewHTTP

2008-11-04 Thread codesite-noreply
Issue 3772: Distributed reliability test failures with NewHTTP http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3772 Comment #14 by [EMAIL PROTECTED]: crash fix committed in r4624 unit test committed in r4714 verified success on the subsequent chromebot runs: {4629, 4641, 4657, 4698} Moving t

[chromium-bugs] Issue 3772 in chromium: Distributed reliability test failures with NewHTTP

2008-11-03 Thread codesite-noreply
Issue 3772: Distributed reliability test failures with NewHTTP http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3772 Comment #13 by [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Ok cool, chromium buildbot 4522 has some useful stacks which hold the answer: --- Problem sequence --- 1. Ma

[chromium-bugs] Issue 3772 in chromium: Distributed reliability test failures with NewHTTP

2008-11-01 Thread codesite-noreply
Issue 3772: Distributed reliability test failures with NewHTTP http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3772 Comment #12 by [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Yep, we are in fact hitting case (1). And your suspicions of socket reuse are spot on. The new data points are: - establishing_tunnel_ is never

[chromium-bugs] Issue 3772 in chromium: Distributed reliability test failures with NewHTTP

2008-11-01 Thread codesite-noreply
Issue 3772: Distributed reliability test failures with NewHTTP http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3772 Comment #11 by [EMAIL PROTECTED]: For case (1), it's also possible that reused_socket_ is true, so we skip connect and proceed to write the request headers. But I can't explain

[chromium-bugs] Issue 3772 in chromium: Distributed reliability test failures with NewHTTP

2008-10-31 Thread codesite-noreply
Issue 3772: Distributed reliability test failures with NewHTTP http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3772 Comment #10 by [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Silly me, swapped case (1) and case (2) in the comment. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of thi

[chromium-bugs] Issue 3772 in chromium: Distributed reliability test failures with NewHTTP

2008-10-31 Thread codesite-noreply
Issue 3772: Distributed reliability test failures with NewHTTP http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3772 Comment #9 by [EMAIL PROTECTED]: wtc points out that establishing_tunnel_ is set to false inside of the 200 case, so we still need to explain the mismatch of establishing_tunne

[chromium-bugs] Issue 3772 in chromium: Distributed reliability test failures with NewHTTP

2008-10-31 Thread codesite-noreply
Issue 3772: Distributed reliability test failures with NewHTTP http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3772 Comment #8 by [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Instrumented code results are in, and we now know: (1) |this| is a valid initialized instance of (HttpNetworkTransaction) (5) this->url.SchemeIs

[chromium-bugs] Issue 3772 in chromium: Distributed reliability test failures with NewHTTP

2008-10-30 Thread codesite-noreply
Issue 3772: Distributed reliability test failures with NewHTTP http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3772 Comment #6 by [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The results from instrumentation confirm the virtual dispatch on bad object theory. The magic value put on the stack is 0xDEADBEFC, which mean

[chromium-bugs] Issue 3772 in chromium: Distributed reliability test failures with NewHTTP

2008-10-29 Thread codesite-noreply
Issue 3772: Distributed reliability test failures with NewHTTP http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3772 Comment #5 by [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > I think the easiest thing to do now is do some runs of chrome-bot to collect full- memory dumps. Alas, Huan says we can't do full memory dum

[chromium-bugs] Issue 3772 in chromium: Distributed reliability test failures with NewHTTP

2008-10-29 Thread codesite-noreply
Issue 3772: Distributed reliability test failures with NewHTTP http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3772 Comment #4 by [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [update with some findings and speculation; nothing conclusive so don't obligated to read]: The dumps I looked at were fairly consistent, bein

[chromium-bugs] Issue 3772 in chromium: Distributed reliability test failures with NewHTTP

2008-10-27 Thread codesite-noreply
Issue 3772: Distributed reliability test failures with NewHTTP http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3772 Comment #3 by [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The value of STATE_READ_HEADERS_COMPLETE is 15. I wonder if there's something special about the value (15 = 0xF). It's strange that we always c

[chromium-bugs] Issue 3772 in chromium: Distributed reliability test failures with NewHTTP

2008-10-27 Thread codesite-noreply
Issue 3772: Distributed reliability test failures with NewHTTP http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3772 Comment #2 by [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I don't have a good idea on what might have caused this crash. In HttpCache::Transaction::BeginNetworkRequest() we have just created a transactio

[chromium-bugs] Issue 3772 in chromium: Distributed reliability test failures with NewHTTP

2008-10-27 Thread codesite-noreply
Issue 3772: Distributed reliability test failures with NewHTTP http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3772 Comment #1 by [EMAIL PROTECTED]: From report id 63fd8e4f802a3ff: Thread 4 *CRASHED* (EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION @0x625c3a43) 0x02e18909 [chrome.dll - http_network_tra

[chromium-bugs] Issue 3772 in chromium: Distributed reliability test failures with NewHTTP

2008-10-27 Thread codesite-noreply
Issue 3772: Distributed reliability test failures with NewHTTP http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3772 New issue report by [EMAIL PROTECTED]: crash: http://www.metacafe.com/ crash: http://www.orkut.com/ crash: http://www.passport.net/ crash: http://www.blogger.com/ Issue attri