Updates:
Labels: -Mstone-2.0 Mstone-X
Comment #5 on issue 5650 by m...@chromium.org: FilePath::IsPathAbsolute vs.
file_util::AbsolutePath
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=5650
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are list
Comment #3 on issue 5650 by erik...@chromium.org: FilePath::IsPathAbsolute
vs. file_util::AbsolutePath
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=5650
If you want to differentiate Absolute from Canonical, then we should rename
file_util::AbsolutePath to be file_util::CanonicalPath. Ha
Comment #2 on issue 5650 by mmentovai: FilePath::IsPathAbsolute vs.
file_util::AbsolutePath
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=5650
(which doesn't exist because I was forced to take a whole host of things
out of
FilePath, but if you have a need for IsPathCanonical we can put
Comment #1 on issue 5650 by mmentovai: FilePath::IsPathAbsolute vs.
file_util::AbsolutePath
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=5650
Erik, it sounds like what you want is IsPathCanonical.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issu
Status: Untriaged
Owner: m...@chromium.org
Labels: Type-Bug Pri-2 OS-All Area-Misc
New issue 5650 by erik...@chromium.org: FilePath::IsPathAbsolute vs.
file_util::AbsolutePath
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=5650
It looks like we have two definitions of absolute paths. IsPa
