[chromium-bugs] Issue 9578 in chromium: Rebaseline shadow tests on WIN32

2009-04-07 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #9 on issue 9578 by a...@chromium.org: Rebaseline shadow tests on WIN32 http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=9578 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of thi

[chromium-bugs] Issue 9578 in chromium: Rebaseline shadow tests on WIN32

2009-04-06 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Labels: LayoutTests Comment #8 on issue 9578 by p...@chromium.org: Rebaseline shadow tests on WIN32 http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=9578 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields

[chromium-bugs] Issue 9578 in chromium: Rebaseline shadow tests on WIN32

2009-04-03 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #6 on issue 9578 by rafa...@chromium.org: Rebaseline shadow tests on WIN32 http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=9578 I expected this. The change is that -if the text and the shadow are both opaque (no alpha transparency) and -the shadow is not blurred ->then we let GDI

[chromium-bugs] Issue 9578 in chromium: Rebaseline shadow tests on WIN32

2009-04-03 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #5 on issue 9578 by a...@chromium.org: Rebaseline shadow tests on WIN32 http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=9578 Yeah actually, this did appear to regress us in an unexpected way. Attaching a before (expected) and after (actual). The letters are clearly no longer anti

[chromium-bugs] Issue 9578 in chromium: Rebaseline shadow tests on WIN32

2009-03-31 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: Assigned Cc: rafa...@chromium.org bre...@chromium.org da...@chromium.org Comment #4 on issue 9578 by m...@chromium.org: Rebaseline shadow tests on WIN32 http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=9578 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You re

[chromium-bugs] Issue 9578 in chromium: Rebaseline shadow tests on WIN32

2009-03-31 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #3 on issue 9578 by jer...@chromium.org: Rebaseline shadow tests on WIN32 http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=9578 I looked at rebaselining these myself but it with this change, text now looks like it's no longer antialiased. Letting more knowledgeable people handle th

[chromium-bugs] Issue 9578 in chromium: Rebaseline shadow tests on WIN32

2009-03-31 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #2 on issue 9578 by jer...@chromium.org: Rebaseline shadow tests on WIN32 http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=9578 Relevant lines from tests_fixable: WIN : LayoutTests/fast/css/shadow-multiple.html = FAIL WIN : LayoutTests/fast/repaint/shadow-multiple-horizontal.html = F

[chromium-bugs] Issue 9578 in chromium: Rebaseline shadow tests on WIN32

2009-03-31 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Owner: a...@chromium.org Comment #1 on issue 9578 by a...@chromium.org: Rebaseline shadow tests on WIN32 http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=9578 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fi

[chromium-bugs] Issue 9578 in chromium: Rebaseline shadow tests on WIN32

2009-03-31 Thread codesite-noreply
Status: Available Owner: rafa...@chromium.org CC: jer...@chromium.org Labels: Type-Bug Pri-1 OS-Windows Area-WebKit Size-Medium Mstone-2.0 New issue 9578 by jer...@chromium.org: Rebaseline shadow tests on WIN32 http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=9578 A bunch of tests need to be r