The best web site of the world, you must like it !
www.smithbux.com/?r=binge2008binge
http://performancebux.com/index.php?ref=binge2008binge
http://www.perfectbux.com/index.php?page=home&r=45904
http://www.newbux4u.com/?locale=en&r=binge2008binge
www.lu8.org
www.1dis.cn
--~--~-~--~---
I personally like the idea of page-modal dialogs. I also understand this
has usability issues and they are not easy to solve. If one page in i a tab
group displays a javascript initiated page-modal dialog others in the same
group could display a page modal dialog that would say something like: Pag
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Sverrir Á. Berg wrote:
> I personally like the idea of page-modal dialogs. I also understand this
> has usability issues and they are not easy to solve.
> If one page in i a tab group displays a javascript initiated page-modal
> dialog others in the same group c
>
>
> I don't think this is the case for Flash. I think the expectation is
> if flash do ShowAlert(), no other javascript should be running while
> it's in ShowAlert(). That means we could make ShowAlert() return
> right away and not show any dialog, but if we did want to show a
> dialog (which w
I just read
http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2008/12/google-tests-navigational-suggestions.html
about adding links in the Suggest-area under the search bar. The
Omnibar does this (sans blue+underline), but I still have to type, hit
down-arrow 3 times and enter. It'd be great to do this with fewer
Apart from not being able to delete spammy pages, it seems the
spammers themselves won't disappear. What's wrong?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Chromium-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email
On Dec 16, 8:50 pm, Mike Belshe wrote:
> My thought is that extensions should not apply in the incognito mode.
That would be terrible. Imagine a usability extension (zoom part of
the view, support for alternate input method, etc)
and it would go away when you're incognito. Sorry to disagree but
I've filed bugs to track these (minus the ones Ojan fixed):
> 122 BrowserTest.JavascriptAlertActivatesTab
5668
> 82 ErrorPageTest.DNSError
5669
> 52 BrowserTest.TabNavigationAccelerators
5670
> 35 ChromeMainTest.SecondLaunch
5671
> 35 AutomationProxyTest.GetTa
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 7:01 AM, idanan wrote:
>
> On Dec 16, 8:50 pm, Mike Belshe wrote:
> > My thought is that extensions should not apply in the incognito mode.
>
> That would be terrible. Imagine a usability extension (zoom part of
> the view, support for alternate input method, etc)
> and i
I'm not sure I understand all this email, but I'll take a shot at it.
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 6:09 AM, Simon B. wrote:
> Maybe row-numbering the suggestions also for real, in the browser,
> could help somehow? I could maybe type skä.3 (.3 is not a TLD,
> and maybe uncommon enough to be prevente
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Evan Martin wrote:
> However, many of our image expected outputs need to be regenerated,
> because the font antialiasing is slightly different.
> Tony set up a temporary pixel builder on his desktop, which Googlers
> can access at go/chrome_linuxpixel ; hopefully
Sorry to jump in late here, but I can contribute a few thoughts. (For those
interested, I've been working on how pages are divided into different
renderer processes / tab groups.)
First, Darin's right that some groups of pages would have to be suspended
together, since they can access each other o
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Charles Reis wrote:
> Sorry to jump in late here, but I can contribute a few thoughts. (For
> those interested, I've been working on how pages are divided into different
> renderer processes / tab groups.)
> First, Darin's right that some groups of pages would h
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> I don't see how the UI for a seemingly random set of tabs being blocked by
> a dialog in one tab could be done in a reasonable fashion. It seems like it
> would be really confusing UI :-)
>
I agree in principle; in practice the idea would
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Peter Kasting wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
>
>> I don't see how the UI for a seemingly random set of tabs being blocked by
>> a dialog in one tab could be done in a reasonable fashion. It seems like it
>> would be really confusi
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> Why not try to do something cleaner (and more predictable) like
> auto-dismiss background alerts?
How would autodismissing background alerts work with, eg, calendar
meeting notifications. Would we just recommend some other, new way for
dev
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
>
> This idea is similar to what happens today when one tab runs a synchronous
> XMLHttpRequest that takes a long time to complete. The other tabs in the
> same renderer become mysteriously unresponsive.
>
(I would love to do something for th
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Peter Kasting wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
>>
>> This idea is similar to what happens today when one tab runs a synchronous
>> XMLHttpRequest that takes a long time to complete. The other tabs in the
>> same renderer become mys
Yes. This thread has clearly grown too large. The proposal for calendar
like apps is mentioned above.
-Darin
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Aaron Boodman wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> > Why not try to do something cleaner (and more predictable) like
>
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Peter Kasting wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
>>
>> This idea is similar to what happens today when one tab runs a synchronous
>> XMLHttpRequest that takes a long time to complete. The other tabs in the
>> same renderer become mys
by the way, we already auto-dismiss alerts that have been generated too
frequently.
-Darin
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Charles Reis wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Peter Kasting wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
>>>
>>> This idea is similar t
Hi,
I've been wanting to get into some contribution-mode, so I have gotten
far enough to download the source and make my environment compatible
(MacbookPro, 2.4GHz, 2Gb RAM). However, on Tuesday, the svn repository
seemed to be offline for about an hour or so while I was trying to get
sync'ed, th
Personally I've never seen that error before.
I'd suggest you try checking out a fresh copy. Let us know if that fixes
things...
Best regards,
Jeremy
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Jaff wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been wanting to get into some contribution-mode, so I have gotten
> far enough t
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Jeremy Moskovich wrote:
> I'd suggest you try checking out a fresh copy.
>
And make sure to follow the build instructions precisely and use gclient to
manage things. Using svn directly or mucking around in your .gclient file
can both lead to problems.
PK
--~--
Probably my fault, let me confirm.
M-A
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Jaff wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been wanting to get into some contribution-mode, so I have gotten
> far enough to download the source and make my environment compatible
> (MacbookPro, 2.4GHz, 2Gb RAM). However, on Tuesday, the
This is odd; it is an entirely fresh copy. Except maybe I left a .svn
directory in there...
On Dec 18, 12:50 pm, Jeremy Moskovich wrote:
> Personally I've never seen that error before.
>
> I'd suggest you try checking out a fresh copy. Let us know if that fixes
> things...
>
> Best regards,
> J
Hello,
I hope now all pages are correctly saved (open page list, and click on
show details).
The longest but surest way for saving a page would be: edit, edit
HTML, update, save, and finally save &publish.
Cheers
Aldo
(voluntary helper in Groups Help Forum)
Click on http://groups.google.com/gr
Ok it's probably just that when src.chromium.org failed, svn spit an
invalid .svn directory.
rm -rf src/third_party/WebKit
and try
gclient sync --force
M-A
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Jaff wrote:
>
> This is odd; it is an entirely fresh copy. Except maybe I left a .svn
> directory in ther
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:31 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 6:02 PM, Nick Baum wrote:
>
>> Dragging bookmarklets to the bookmarks bar would work the same way as it
>> does now; I think it'd be confusing to do something fancy here.
>>
>
> Wait, so you can have bookmarklets on
On Dec 17, 11:43 pm, Aaron Boodman wrote:
...
> What UI do you envision for disabling extensions per-profile? I guess
> this could go in a future management UI? What about for incognito
> mode? Perhaps in the management screen, we could have a checkmark for
> whether an extension is enabled in in
30 matches
Mail list logo
