I argued from the point of consistency and mentioned my personal preference
only as an afternote to point out that the consistent behavior would not be
universally despised.
PK
On Jun 27, 2009 4:08 PM, "krtulmay" wrote:
This is fine except for the other 50% of users who do want the browser
to
Hi Dean,
So I've dropped in a change that switches directories to have name like:
(base)
(test_shell)
This will allow you to run things at the command line again.
I don't find this choice particularly ascetic myself. But the options where
limited, because the following characters cannot appear i
This one is the hardest to test, you need to run a pristinely clean system
to execute.
Also - don't forget to make the browser window sizes the same (and with the
same amount of visible window) for all browsers under test, because if the
kernel can't offload to the graphics card, the display memory
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Linus Upson wrote:
> If I recall correctly, the best way we found to measure the total memory
> usage of a multi-process system like chrome was to measure the total commit
> charge of windows as you run the test.
My favorite test is to plot the performance of the
This is fine except for the other 50% of users who do want the browser
to change tabs for them.
And before you reply with "there are more than 50% of users who want
new tabs queued in the background" or say that it's your preference, I
would like to see explicitly a statement from Google's testin
If I recall correctly, the best way we found to measure the total memory
usage of a multi-process system like chrome was to measure the total commit
charge of windows as you run the test. This will correctly account for
shared memory, mapped pages that have been touched, kernel memory, etc. I
don't
Awesome. Thanks Brad!
On Jun 27, 1:52 pm, Bradley Nelson wrote:
> You can undefine items with:
> 'defines!: [
> 'WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN',
> ],
>
> -BradN
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Daniel Cowx wrote:
>
> > Okay, I've figured out that I can do:
>
> >
> > 'msvs_settings': {
> > '
You can undefine items with:
'defines!: [
'WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN',
],
-BradN
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Daniel Cowx wrote:
>
> Okay, I've figured out that I can do:
>
>
> 'msvs_settings': {
> 'VCCLCompilerTool': {
>'UndefinePreprocessorDefinitions': 'WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN',
> },
>
Okay, I've figured out that I can do:
'msvs_settings': {
'VCCLCompilerTool': {
'UndefinePreprocessorDefinitions': 'WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN',
},
},
Though this works, it will cause a command line warning D9025 to be
issued b/c you're undefining a previous define. I'd prefer if there
was a w
I have a third_party project that assumes that WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN is
*not* defined. Unfortunately, common.gypi defines it, so I'm getting
lots of compiler errors that I dont particularly want to track down.
What's teh best way to either a) undefine WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN from
common.gypi, or b) ensu
No use case. I was just creating a new GYP file and wanted to know
what encoding to save the file as...that's all :-)
On Jun 26, 10:52 pm, Bradley Nelson wrote:
> The intention was ascii AFAIK. Unless someone has a use case?
> -BradN
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Daniel Cowx wrote:
>
re: Your comment "the cost is big".
FWIW: One item that I recall was very complex was the message loop
implementation, which handles both native Windows events and coordinates
inter-thread Task processing.. It was quite difficult to create a task
processing system that integrated with the Windows
12 matches
Mail list logo