This is awesome, and certainly not thankless.
Linus
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
> Dimitri, the LTTF, and anyone else involved, you are awesome, and I
> consider your work to have the largest "importance / (satisfaction +
> recognition)" value on the team. This is a t
scrolling jank in gmail
http://crbug.com/25741
Linus
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 8:05 AM, Evan Martin wrote:
> > General comments: Linux tends to be "lighter" which means it does
> > better on older hardware, so depending on what sorts of la
Yes, please! However, I would get that dialog about 1000 times a day:
http://crbug.com/22948
Linus
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Paweł Hajdan Jr. wrote:
> Just a while before one of my tabs (GMail) started using a lot of CPU time
> (67% while I was compiling in the background). The browser an
happening very often, so I'm not particularly worried about it being
> annoying.
>
> -Nick
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Linus Upson wrote:
>
>> Yes. Please do not add more ways for script to instigate out-of-page UI.
>> It is all evil.
>> Li
Yes. Please do not add more ways for script to instigate out-of-page UI. It
is all evil.
Linus
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Ben Goodger (Google) wrote:
>
> We should only allow this UI to be invoked from a user gesture.
>
> -Ben
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Jeremy Orlow
> wrote:
>
I see similar jankiness on Windows. Someone is blocking the main thread.
Linus
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Amanda Walker wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Mark Mentovai wrote:
>
>> HTTP resource loading shouldn't be on the browser's main thread. This
>> only applies to DOM UI re
I love the little daemon in the Chuck Taylors, but why?
Linus
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~--
Any chance gold will support linking Windows binaries?
Linus
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Joel Stanley wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 17:06, Lei Zhang wrote:
>
> > Only x86 and x86_64 were supported at the time gold was originally
> > released. Does it support ARM yet?
>
> Yes, gold can
It would be nice to have something about memory consumption in the Speed
section as well.
Linus
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> Very nice!
> Some things I would add to the speed section:
> *How will my code perform when the operating system or hard disk is bogged
> down?
Does all this work with Purify?
Linus
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Mike Belshe wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 9:57 PM, Dean McNamee wrote:
>
>> Do we have numbers on how the 4 allocates compare on those tests (page
>> cycler, etc)?
>
>
> I do - I sent some of them around a few days ago.
stant to attack.
Linus
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Erik Kay wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Linus Upson wrote:
>
>> I realize this is not a small request, but it would be better if we could
>> move to a model where the browser was sandboxed and talked to a muc
I agree on the need for a better UI to manage cached resources and
selectively clear parts of the cache. The current web model of per-origin
grouping isn't very satisfying because some apps span multiple origins and
some origins host multiple apps. Given the extensive discussions around this
for th
accounts for recency, usage, size, etc.?
Linus
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Ian Fette wrote:
> Add them to the malware blacklist :)
>
> 2009/7/29 Jeremy Orlow
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Linus Upson wrote:
>>
>>> I'm coming to the opinion that
I'm coming to the opinion that we should leverage the install mechanism of
the extension system for apps that need special permissions, increased
quotas, expanded lifetimes, etc. The extension can be almost vacuous, and in
our extension world exceptionally lightweight. It only needs to make the
spe
I realize this is not a small request, but it would be better if we could
move to a model where the browser was sandboxed and talked to a much simpler
process to carry out trusted operations on its behalf.
Linus
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 3:29 AM, Eric Roman wrote:
>
> Here is a design document fo
With a good heuristic, I think it will be very unlikely that we'll kill a
renderer that has useful state. What are the chances that a tab on a site
that I don't go to often, and that I opened 30 tabs ago has js/dom state
that is critical for me? Mobile browsers already euthanize unused
tabs aggress
If I recall correctly, the best way we found to measure the total memory
usage of a multi-process system like chrome was to measure the total commit
charge of windows as you run the test. This will correctly account for
shared memory, mapped pages that have been touched, kernel memory, etc. I
don't
I think it would be great if I could turn on a pref in release builds that
would show me jank. I'd also like to see all of the UI elements turn crazy
colors if we fail to service the event queue in less than 200ms.
Linus
2009/5/19 James Hawkins
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 11:20 PM, William Chan
I think this is important. I've been noticing the jank level rising as well.
Linus
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Ben Goodger (Google) wrote:
>
> Though I've upgraded my desktop PC to fancy hardware, I still use a
> Core 2 Duo 2.4GHz laptop with 2GB RAM. This is still a pretty typical
> config
So long as none of these are hangs, crashes or other Bad Things, then
deferring them seems fine.
Linus
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Mark Larson (Google) wrote:
> Based on all the discussions I've had offline about the use of SVG on the
> web, I think it's fine to defer these tests.
>
>
> On
An angel loses its wings for each 00 byte in UTF-16. Is 'host'
measured in base-2 or base-10?
Linus
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Evan Martin wrote:
>
> [A bunch of the team met up today to hammer out some decisions.]
>
> In brief: for strings that are known to be Unicode (that is, not
> ran
Can't we shame someone in the linuxosphere to add macos style sandbox() to
the kernel?
Linus
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 1:58 AM, Dean McNamee wrote:
>
> Well, we don't have a sandbox on Linux. The normal fd-passing
> recvmesg() should work fine. Who knows if it will work if we ever get
> a sandb
ack stroked shadow.") ...
>>
>> Yeah, there are some bugs (scrolling messes up the shadows too).
>>
>> Probably this: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=2982
>
> Actually, meant to paste this bug number as it includes the repro.
>
> htt
Do you also want a list of chrome specific non-webkit goodies like the
new network stack?
Linus
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:44 AM, David Levin wrote:
> This fellow has done a good job of highlighting improvements to WebKit on an
> on going basis:
> http://hanblog.info/blog/category/WebKit
> Of
Perhaps the work Charlie is doing could help here.
Linus
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Brian Ellis wrote:
>
> I may be repeating what Peter said to some extent, but unless I'm
> missing something (and I may well be), the browser's security model
> should prevent pages from referring to each
Anything you can do to make the animations smoother and less janky
would also be appreciated.
Linus
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 10:03 PM, Ben Goodger (Google) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> In a continuation of the state/view separation work I have been doing
> with the Browser window, my attentio
Very nice.
Linus
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Evan Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Dude, gmail works in the test shell on Linux!
> >
> > But not the enter key, last I checked -- I screwed up keyboard
> > handlin
If you want to argue using data, we'll use that. If you want to argue
using opinions, we'll use mine.
Linus
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Amanda Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> They work fine, though using Apache as an example, a Linux box running
> Apache can generally handle a higher lo
First thoughts:
1. It would be good if this proposal converged in some way with HTML 5 workers
2. There needs to be a way to name and communicate with these tasks
(perhaps HTML 5 worksers have such a thing?)
3. I also don't see a need for the "start on browser launch" option
4. I don't think w
29 matches
Mail list logo
