- est electronix...@gmail.com wrote:
not working on 4.0.202.0 (23600)?
chrome.exe --enable-sync
Did you enable the option in the wrench menu? See
http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/2009/08/dev-channel-update_17.html
cheers,
mike
On 29-Jul-09, at 2:31 PM, Ian Fette wrote:
Add them to the malware blacklist :)
Yeah, I think this is right. Bad acting websites should be considered
malware, and blocked for that reason.
Linus: I agree that we can (and probably should) work on the webapps
list to build some good
On 29-Jul-09, at 2:32 PM, Drew Wilson wrote:
BTW, I can't find the HTML5 sql storage spec anymore - google is
totally failing me. Anyone have a link?
http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/
cheers,
mike
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list:
On 29-Jul-09, at 2:35 PM, Ian Fette wrote:
It got ripped out because Mozilla has refused to implement. An old
version is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/webstorage/
Well, more because people felt like it was a contentious item that was
bloating / delaying the completion of HTML5. The
On 28-Jul-09, at 11:55 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
Putting aside the technical questions here, I'm a little skeptical
from a UI perspective. How do I know what's OK and what's not? If
a bad app wants to use a lot of disk, can it convince me to let it
if I'm a novice user? In other
On 26-Jun-09, at 12:59 PM, Mike Belshe wrote:
Overall, though, that should mean that we're *not* double counting
memory. In fact, when I observed as the test ran, there were only
three processes: one for the browser, one for the single content
process from which all tabs were spawned,
On 25-Jun-09, at 12:52 PM, Mike Belshe wrote:
Yeah, the APIs all have constraints. We end up walking the pages
and adding them up. See process_util_win.cc in the chromium tree.
Be sure to check about:memory and hover over the little ? icons to
see what we measure.
This screen
On 25-Jun-09, at 6:26 PM, Mike Beltzner wrote:
here's a ZIP with the
required code (needs Python 2.5 or later to be installed on your
system):
Oops, forgot the link!
http://people.mozilla.org/~beltzner/membuster-talos.rar
cheers,
mike
On 25-Jun-09, at 7:02 PM, Mike Belshe wrote:
This screen actually confuses me a little, as the Summary statistics
don't match the summation of the process based statistics. Do you
mean to say your summary statistics take into account the memory
that's being shared across the various
On 21-Jun-09, at 10:22 AM, Mike Belshe wrote:
Second, the author is basically right. Since he's running on Vista,
its a bit hard to tell whether his stats included shared memory or
not; using the default memory statistic (Memory (Private Working
Set)) is actually a pretty good measure
On 20-May-09, at 6:58 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
Similar-sounding goals to Chrome extensions: web-tech-based, no
restart needed, backwards-compatible, etc.
... API-based for well-understood common developer tasks (user
notifications, bookmark integration, UI additions, etc), lower barrier
On 21-May-09, at 12:51 PM, Nick Baum wrote:
Re:standardizing APIs, we're relying on HTML5 as much as possible.
For example, we'll provide HTML5 LocalStorage and Databases instead
of rolling our own storage API. The
That's good to know, and yeah, I assumed we'd leverage as much web-
On 6-May-09, at 3:30 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
Anyhow, I've heard arguments both ways. Some people think we should
not let the standards keep us from experimenting (and then raising
the topics with the standards group later) and some people think
it's better to bring up the idea and
On 6-May-09, at 9:56 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
From a security point of view, we'd ideally like to render feeds with
JavaScript and plug-ins disabled, as well as in a noAccess
SecurityOrigin. This is easier if the feed preview lives in its own
scheme. I'm happy to help out with the security
Congratulations on entering the zeitgeist! It's certainly an exciting time
for web browsers and the web.
cheers,
mike
- Original Message -
From: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
To: Chromium-dev chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thu Mar 12 16:55:41 2009
On 4-Mar-09, at 4:38 PM, Evan Martin wrote:
Here's the core of that implementation:
http://lab.arc90.com/experiments/readability/js/readability-0.1.js
It's heuristic-based, e.g.:
// Study all the paragraphs and find the chunk that has the most
p's and keep it:
For what it's worth,
16 matches
Mail list logo
