to ensure it does what my users expect when the keyboard mapping
isn't a straight 104 key Windows US keyboard.
Please reconsider.
Simon
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 7:27 AM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
Ultimately, I believe we'll need to generate a sequence of WebKeyboardEvent
objects from
.
Regards,
Simon
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Dominic Mazzoni dmazz...@google.com wrote:
Hi Darin,
Erik suggested you might have some thoughts. In my proposed extension
api for accessibility (http://codereview.chromium.org/402099) one of
the functions is to simulate a key press. How should
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Dominic Mazzoni dmazz...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Simon Stewart
simon.m.stew...@gmail.com wrote:
The easiest thing for someone who's attempting to use the
accessibility API may be to avoid using keycodes, and instead allow
the input
Good idea. I can have a look at it. I'm still not sure how to handle
the case of nested iframes.
Simon
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Aaron Boodman a...@google.com wrote:
Can you send that sort of information in the initial message? Like,
send a field like:
is_top: window == top
a single extension to the public.
Regards,
Simon
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Mohamed Mansour m...@chromium.org wrote:
Why not just let the extension developer do different versions him/herself.
When I download an extension, I don't want to download libraries/plugins
from 10 different
I'm not sure if this is the right answer for you.
Regards,
Simon
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 6:46 PM, hap 497 hap...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you please tell me how you remote control an instance of chromium
without using Automation Proxy?
Thank you.
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 2:15 AM, Simon
What about different bitness? Most OS versions come in 32 and 64 bit
flavours, and this specification doesn't seem to allow this
differentiation.
Simon
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 1:51 AM, Matt Perry mpcompl...@chromium.org wrote:
Right now we have this manifest key for plugins: plugins: [
{path
at:
http://selenium.googlecode.com/
Regards,
Simon
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:25 PM, hap 497 hap...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you.
My goal is to remote control (e.g. load an url) a running instance of
browser.
That is why I am trying to run this AutomationProxyTest NavigateToURL
I thought that the AutomationProxy wasn't available in released
versions of Chrome A look at the symbols exported by the
chrome.dll suggests that this is the case.
Simon
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Paweł Hajdan Jr.
phajdan...@chromium.org wrote:
Then probably you should just use
, it avoids requiring the
browser window to have focus. Since webdriver tests tend to run for a
long time, it's useful to allow users to do something else with their
computer as they run.
Regards,
Simon
On Jul 17, 7:55 pm, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Daniel
If a heuristic can judge the accuracy, then this readbility mode could
be offered as a hint in some part of the screen (top or bottom right,
similar to popup blocker does/used to do?).
Otherwise there is an option for a fallback solution. Look at Aardvark
(firefox plugin,
The new tab window 9 most popular heuristic seems to include my 9 most
visited, but doesn't seem to mind whether I ever open them from the
New tab window thumbnails, or if I always open by typing.
How about adding some score to those thumbnails I actually click on?
Or if that requires extra data
If there is still an issue about scons startup time (which lead Amanda
to suggest trying to get a scons server / deamon, quoted below) I
think I found some good news:
scons --interactive
Added by Adam Simpkins about a year ago: http://www.scons.org/CHANGES.txt
From the docs, I guess
On Dec 17, 11:43 pm, Aaron Boodman a...@chromium.org wrote:
...
What UI do you envision for disabling extensions per-profile? I guess
this could go in a future management UI? What about for incognito
mode? Perhaps in the management screen, we could have a checkmark for
whether an extension is
Will userscripts/extensions be able to manage bookmarks? That could be
a way to have buttons as bookmarks, in the same way as Bookmarklets
already work with urls like javascript:extensionFunction(). Also
bookmark import/export features and self-updating bookmarks (stock
tickers, RSS?) could make
Warning: Evangelism for breadth-first, or open in background tab, as
the better solution!
I avoid open in foreground because the new page never loads sub-
second, so I'm wasting time if I look at a loading page. Instead I
continue reading down the current page, to try to get through it and
close
The Bookmark bubble doesn't suit me, so I've made some redesign
suggestions:
http://sites.google.com/site/chromiumdev/bookmark-added
My preference is 2A, since it avoids the unbalanced whitespace we have
in the current Bookmarks bubble. Further 2A takes less vertical space,
and mousing down to
One way to lower the cognitive costs with additional menu options: let
users customize menus. A customized menu gets an extra More... as
its last option. (Tooltip suggestion: More options exist. This menu
is customized.). Click to show remaining options below the fold,
including Customize and
...
When the background task is allowed to start, it will continue to run
even when the browser is exited. Next time when the system is started
and the user logs in, the background task will run automatically
without any re-authorization since the permission has already been
granted
Also, what happens next time I visit the app? Is it authorized to launch the
background task, or do I have to re-authorize it?
Surely it has to stay authorized. Someone I asked even expected that
authorization to follow them between different computers!
*Lifetime:* Do we need the start on
HLS, sorry but you've missed out on some news.
The free browser is Chromium, 100% open source. (Google Chrome is 95%
open source, surely not free to redistribute, and contains the
spying auto update feature.)
If you want to have a spy-free browser, get Chromium and disable
search and crash
with double hashing.
Chromiums translations use a MD5 hash -- is there a check in place to
discover hash collisions?)
On 21 Sep., 21:37, Simon B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For translators it can be very useful to have the translations file as
a separate data file. As it is now, I have
Somewhat edited together here:
http://sites.google.com/site/chromiumdev/language-files-in-google-chrome--chromium
What's also needed is some way to communicate mistakes and bad
translations.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
For translators it can be very useful to have the translations file as
a separate data file. With using gettext, I could fix up the Swedish
translation and test it out before propagating my changes upstream. As
it is now, I have prepared some half-hearted attempt and waiting for
The current
24 matches
Mail list logo
