Sounds good to me. It's nice living in the future and being able to
rely on things like signalfd!
- Dan
p.s. I wrote a man page of sorts for that wy back in the past,
before it existed:
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0106.3/0404.html
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Adam Lang
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Adam Langley wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> > Why do you need a child_id if you're going to forget about it anyway?
>
> The thought was that one might want to call EnsureChildTerminates on
> it. If it turns out that nobody needs
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> Why do you need a child_id if you're going to forget about it anyway?
The thought was that one might want to call EnsureChildTerminates on
it. If it turns out that nobody needs that I'll remove it.
Cheers
AGL
--~--~-~--~~-
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Adam Langley wrote:
>
> Our child process reaping is a little bit of a hack right now, which
> is my fault. I didn't anticipate how bad it would turn out.
>
> Currently, we use a bunch of hacks to make sure that we reap all the
> children that we need to, but don'
