So I've officially switched to carbon emacs, and I'm loving it. Is there a
way to launch a second instance - double-clicking the executable seems to
just bring the original instance to the foreground. Feel free to tell me I'm
Doing It Wrong, but when working on two trees simultaneously I like to op
On Nov 3, 2009, at 9:56 AM, Paweł Hajdan Jr. wrote:
> I also tried Xcode, but it seems that the editor isn't powerful
> enough. I don't know how to quickly remove an entire line (2
> keystrokes in Vim)
With the normal Mac key bindings it's Cmd-leftarrow, Shift-downarrow,
delete. If you wa
Note that changing default keybindings will cause lots of false alarms when
you run WebKit layout tests :(
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Nico Weber wrote:
>
> > Thanks for all answers! I think I'll use CarbonEmacs for editing (it's
> great, my entire .emacs finally works) and Xcode for compil
> Thanks for all answers! I think I'll use CarbonEmacs for editing (it's great,
> my entire .emacs finally works) and Xcode for compiling. Aquamacs just landed
> in the trash.
> It's nice that Xcode supports some Emacs keybindings - I didn't know that.
That's a feature of OS X, these keybinding
Thanks for all answers! I think I'll use CarbonEmacs for editing (it's
great, my entire .emacs finally works) and Xcode for compiling. Aquamacs
just landed in the trash.
It's nice that Xcode supports some Emacs keybindings - I didn't know that.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~
In Carbon emacs, the command key works as Meta, and copying/pasting is
integrated with the system clipboard. There are probably other
advantages.
-Ken
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Drew Wilson wrote:
> I've heard this suggested a few times (not just in this thread) - is there
> an advantage t
I've heard this suggested a few times (not just in this thread) - is there
an advantage to running Carbon Emacs instead of
plain-old-GNU-Emacs-in-a-terminal?
-atw
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Scott Hess wrote:
> +1. I found Aquamacs weird/annoying. Carbon Emacs seemed a lot
> better. [I c
Carbon Emacs makes the Alt key work right, and copy/paste to the
system pasteboard works like I expect w/in emacs. I find using emacs
w/in Terminal.app to be annoying enough that I use emacsclient to
throw edits out to Emacs.app.
-scott
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Drew Wilson wrote:
> I'v
+1. I found Aquamacs weird/annoying. Carbon Emacs seemed a lot
better. [I come from a Linux background.]
-scott
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Kenneth Russell wrote:
>
> There's a Carbon-based, non-Aquamacs Emacs available for Mac OS X.
> Recommended.
>
> http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/E
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Paweł Hajdan Jr.
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 19:08, Drew Wilson wrote:
>
>> I've also been known to use the built-in GNU emacs from a terminal shell
>> (especially when working remotely/SSH-ing). I see no reason why you can't
>> have the same experience that y
There's a Carbon-based, non-Aquamacs Emacs available for Mac OS X. Recommended.
http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/EmacsForMacOS
http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/CarbonEmacsPackage
-Ken
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Drew Wilson wrote:
> I've been using Aquamacs, although I don't like the fact tha
2009/11/3 Paweł Hajdan Jr. :
> Recently I started working more and more on Mac OS X, and I'm trying to find
> an editor that would work the best for me.
> On Linux I used GNU Emacs with many customizations. Some of the most handy
> ones for working on Chromium were Google Style script and launchin
TextMate is pretty solid and very customizable. I wonder if we can get gyp
to generate .tmproj files :P
I also like it's "command line tool" mate for opening files from the
Terminal.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Paweł Hajdan Jr. wrote:
> Recently I started working more and more on Mac OS X,
I heartily recommend MacVim ( http://code.google.com/p/macvim/ ). I
hear its fullscreen mode is pretty rad :-P
Having said that, XCode – like most OS X apps – support some emacs
keybindings. Your "Remove entire line" example is ctrl-a ctrl-k ctrl-k
in XCode.
I usually use some mix of MacVim and
I've been using Aquamacs, although I don't like the fact that it has *so
many* modes built-in and turned-on by default, and I also don't like the
fact that it doesn't lend itself well to customization (it has its own set
of initialization files it keeps hidden off). It's decent, though (but
again,
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 19:08, Drew Wilson wrote:
> I've also been known to use the built-in GNU emacs from a terminal shell
> (especially when working remotely/SSH-ing). I see no reason why you can't
> have the same experience that you do with your Linux box, although you'd
> have to find a way t
16 matches
Mail list logo