This will be possible once Elliot cleans up the lint script so that it
can be sent outside Google.
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Mohamed Mansour
wrote:
> Would be nice to make a gcl lint feature :)
> gcl lint [mychangelist] before we submit it to codereview
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 1:33 P
Awesome! I love lint!
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Mohamed Mansour
wrote:
> Would be nice to make a gcl lint feature :)
> gcl lint [mychangelist] before we submit it to codereview
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Marc-Antoine Ruel wrote:
>
>>
>> Yep, that's simple and neat
>>
>> On We
Would be nice to make a gcl lint feature :)
gcl lint [mychangelist] before we submit it to codereview
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Marc-Antoine Ruel wrote:
>
> Yep, that's simple and neat
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Erik Kay wrote:
> > jam++
> > Great stuff! I like how this is int
Yep, that's simple and neat
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Erik Kay wrote:
> jam++
> Great stuff! I like how this is integrated. It feels very natural.
> Erik
>
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 8:16 PM, John Abd-El-Malek wrote:
>>
>> Just a heads-up that I've integrated the script into our Rietvel
jam++
Great stuff! I like how this is integrated. It feels very natural.
Erik
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 8:16 PM, John Abd-El-Malek wrote:
>
> Just a heads-up that I've integrated the script into our Rietveld
> instance. If you use gcl, it will ping the server at a special url
> after a patchs
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 8:16 PM, John Abd-El-Malek wrote:
> Just a heads-up that I've integrated the script into our Rietveld
> instance.
This is great, thanks very much. Maybe you should send a standalone email
telling people to look for this link just to be sure we don't miss it?
PK
--~--~
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Mohamed Mansour
wrote:
> Awesome John, will save a lot of time for those reviewers. So I assume this
> is only for Google code style, webkit patches reviews will always display an
> error since they have a different style.
That's correct. The script doesn't catc
Awesome John, will save a lot of time for those reviewers. So I assume this
is only for Google code style, webkit patches reviews will always display an
error since they have a different style.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:20 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
>
> Awesome! Thanks John. Trailing whitespace be
Awesome! Thanks John. Trailing whitespace be gone!
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 8:16 PM, John Abd-El-Malek wrote:
>
> Just a heads-up that I've integrated the script into our Rietveld
> instance. If you use gcl, it will ping the server at a special url
> after a patchset upload so that it can lint
Just a heads-up that I've integrated the script into our Rietveld
instance. If you use gcl, it will ping the server at a special url
after a patchset upload so that it can lint the files in the
background. When you visit the issue page, you'll see a "x errors"
link under the Lint column which t
I did an internal search and the current state is:
- "Folks have been looking at open sourcing cpplint"
- In its current incarnation, there is a lot of google-specific checks
that needs to be factored out simply because they don't apply to
external and open source projects.
- Nobody actually took
Ok, so, back to the original question. When can those of us external to
google expect a code style tool? :-)
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Dean McNamee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It doesn't need to be a parser, it's just a linter. You don't really
> need to understand anything about the p
It doesn't need to be a parser, it's just a linter. You don't really
need to understand anything about the program to give useful warnings
about style. Our biggest style violation is probably trailing
whitespace, for example.
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 7:33 PM, Benjamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
You wrote a c++ parser in python? cl! I can't wait to see the source.
-Benjamin Meyer
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Pam Greene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Benjamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
>> <
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Benjamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Sorry to be a pest, but has there been any progress on this?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Marshall
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Pam Greene <[EMA
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry to be a pest, but has there been any progress on this?
>
> Thanks,
> Marshall
>
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Pam Greene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Marshall Greenblat
Sorry to be a pest, but has there been any progress on this?
Thanks,
Marshall
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Pam Greene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Mark/Pam,
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Ma
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Mark/Pam,
>
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Mark Mentovai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Great question. We've been talking about open-sourcing something for
>> this, but so far, we don't have anything yet.
Hi Mark/Pam,
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Mark Mentovai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Great question. We've been talking about open-sourcing something for
> this, but so far, we don't have anything yet. We do have something we
> use internally, but someone needs to go through it and clean u
Marshall Greenblatt wrote:
> Does a tool currently exist for verifying and/or formatting source code
> based on the Google style guide? If not, has any thought been given to
> developing such a tool?
Marshall-
Great question. We've been talking about open-sourcing something for
this, but so fa
I'll ask around and see if I can find one we can open-source.
- Pam
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 7:06 AM, Marshall Greenblatt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Does a tool currently exist for verifying and/or formatting source code
> based on the Google style guide? If not, has any thought be
21 matches
Mail list logo
