On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 07:18:30PM +, Ed W wrote:
> On 07/10/2010 16:17, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> >My chrony todo list keeps growing, but I have now only two major
> >things I'd like to see in the next release:
> >- improve the code which adjusts the polling interval between
> > minpoll and
On 07/10/2010 16:17, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 02:30:46PM +0100, Ed W wrote:
Do you think that we could see a release at some imminent point?
I do realise that there is a git repo, but for various reasons it's
easier to build packages from tarballs. Seems like it's
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 06:27:56PM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> The most promising idea I came up so far is to adjust the interval
> based on number of samples kept in sourcestats, so it remains close to
> a fixed number. This would be configurable, a higher value would mean
> chrony should
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 10:36:19AM -0700, Bill Unruh wrote:
> As far as I could see, ntpd tends to race for long intervals and stick there.
> There seems to be an idea that network resources are prcious and should be
> used as little as possible.
Yes, with low-mid jitters it sometimes goes with
There seems to be an idea that network resources are prcious and
should be
used as little as possible. Since nowadays, network resources ( unless
you in
a sattelite in orbit) are essentially free,
I desire to use chronyd in conjunction with an intermittently connected
satellite system.
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 05:03:28PM +0100, Ed W wrote:
> On 07/10/2010 16:17, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> >
> >BTW, is anyone here keeping up to date with git and testing?
> >
>
> For various (not relevant) reasons it would be a lot easier for me
> to bump my gentoo ebuild to use a named tarball
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 09:02:56AM -0700, Bill Unruh wrote:
> >- improve the code which adjusts the polling interval between
> > minpoll and maxpoll, the current one seems to work quite badly
>
> In what sense "badly"? I looked at it for a while, but did not see how one of
> the other choice
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 02:30:46PM +0100, Ed W wrote:
> Do you think that we could see a release at some imminent point?
>
> I do realise that there is a git repo, but for various reasons it's
> easier to build packages from tarballs. Seems like it's been a
> while since the last big lump of
On 07/10/2010 16:17, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
BTW, is anyone here keeping up to date with git and testing?
For various (not relevant) reasons it would be a lot easier for me to
bump my gentoo ebuild to use a named tarball (and test git) than to pull
from git.
How about cutting a "beta"
Do you think that we could see a release at some imminent point?
I do realise that there is a git repo, but for various reasons it's
easier to build packages from tarballs. Seems like it's been a while
since the last big lump of progress so would be nice to get it out to
the distros?
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 09:02:56AM -0700, Bill Unruh wrote:
- improve the code which adjusts the polling interval between
minpoll and maxpoll, the current one seems to work quite badly
In what sense "badly"? I looked at it for a while, but did not
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 02:30:46PM +0100, Ed W wrote:
Do you think that we could see a release at some imminent point?
I do realise that there is a git repo, but for various reasons it's
easier to build packages from tarballs. Seems like it's been
12 matches
Mail list logo
