Gosh, and I thought that Churchill knew all about it and didn't tell FDR. I've
got to get my non-facts straight!
Evan
-Original Message-
From: Dave Turrell
To: churchillchat
Sent: Tue, Dec 2, 2014 3:16 pm
Subject: RE: [ChurchillChat] Re: Another new book of "debunking"
Looks lik
Comment on WSC as said sarcastically.
The information contained in this communication is confidential and intended
solely for the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message
is not the intended recipient, employee or agent responsible for delivering it
to the intended
I'm quite sure that you are all aware that a Service of Thanksgiving for
Lady Soames took place in Westminster Abbey several weeks ago on the 20th
of November. Their Royal Highnesses The Prince of Wales and The Duchess of
Cornwall represented Her Majesty The Queen and His Royal Highness The Duke
of
The only reason Singapore fell was that the commander failed to take
measures to defend it.
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Quinn Bastian wrote:
> As I recall, the Japanese army attacked Singapore from the rear (jungle
> side) while the majority of the British defenses were set up looking for a
As I recall, the Japanese army attacked Singapore from the rear (jungle side)
while the majority of the British defenses were set up looking for an invasion
from the sea. Yup, we can blame WSC for that one!!
As for FDR's prior knowledge and instigation of the Pearl Harbor attack, if the
documen
On Monday, December 1, 2014 1:15:00 PM UTC-5, Antoine Capet wrote:
>
> Another new book of "debunking" :
> Arnold, Michael. Hollow Heroes: An Unvarnished Look at the Wartime Careers
> of Churchill, Montgomery and Mountbatten.
>
There are only three ways to publish a new book on Churchill these d
Looks like he's got prior form, as the Sweeney might say. Was it just me
who missed the recent information that FDR instigated the attack on Pearl
Harbour?
Dave
Sacrifice of Singapore: Churchill's Biggest Blunder
by Michael Arnold
The fate of Singapore was sealed long before the Japanese atta
'Truths'--what 'truths'? The author's?? I'd like to see what sources he
used for this. Are they 'original' sources, or ones that fit the author's
presuppositions and agendas?
How
*ridiculous.*(Ms.) Patricia Finnegan
pfinn2...@gmail.com
On Monday, December 1, 2014 1:15:00 PM UTC-5, Antoi
