RE: [ChurchillChat] Is Churchill Still Relevant?

:14 PM To: churchillchat@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [ChurchillChat] Is Churchill Still Relevant? She was very much of the "velvet glove" school. Whenever she had suspicions of one of her subjects, she would do him the honor of visiting him. The cost of housing, feeding and en

Re: [ChurchillChat] Is Churchill Still Relevant?

ember 17, 2016 7:34 PM Subject: RE: [ChurchillChat] Is Churchill Still Relevant? #yiv1204025465 #yiv1204025465 -- _filtered #yiv1204025465 {font-family:Helvetica;panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;} _filtered #yiv1204025465 {font-family:Wingdings;panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;} _filtered #yiv1204025

RE: [ChurchillChat] Is Churchill Still Relevant?

: churchillchat@googlegroups.com [mailto:churchillchat@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of chateaustegosau...@att.net Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2016 5:36 PM To: churchillchat@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [ChurchillChat] Is Churchill Still Relevant? I would hope that Elizabeth I would not be relevant

Re: [ChurchillChat] Is Churchill Still Relevant?

I would hope that Elizabeth I would not be relevant.  She ran history's most successful police state.  "The spacious days of good Queen Bess" were extremely repressive - and she got people to love it. Jonathan Hayes From: Richard M. Langworth To: ChurchillChat

Re: [ChurchillChat] Is Churchill Still Relevant?

Dear List members, Churchill saw the writing on the wall of history - and never failed to take the consequences. He was, you could rightfully claim, a geopolitical whistle-blower who issued quite a cavalcade of "early warnings" - e.g. on the nature of the nazi ideology, on the need for European