Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/

Please let us stay on topic and be civil.

OM




YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




--- Begin Message ---
Please send as far and wide as possible.

Thanks,
Robert Sterling
Editor, The Konformist
http://www.konformist.com

Democrats attack new bill over Net neutrality
By Anne Broache
News.com
CNet

WASHINGTON--Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives on 
Thursday assailed a new telecommunications bill for allegedly 
failing to preserve Net neutrality principles.

The Republican-backed proposal unveiled this week would give the 
Federal Communications Commission the authority to go after 
individual violations of end-to-end connectivity principles, but it 
does not include a weighty set of regulations that all broadband 
providers must follow. 

But that's not nearly sufficiently regulatory, the Democrats 
charged, pointing to the section of the measure that prohibits the 
FCC from making any new rules related to Net neutrality. Many 
technology firms, including Microsoft and Google, have also backed 
more regulations. 

Net neutrality, also known as network neutrality, is the idea that 
the companies that own the broadband pipes should not be able to 
configure their networks in a way that plays favorites--allowing 
them, for example, to transmit their own services at faster speeds, 
or to charge Net content and application companies a fee for equally 
fast delivery. 

"The bill before us effectively condones online discrimination and 
ties the hands of the FCC," Rep. Edward Markey, a Massachusetts 
Democrat, said at a lengthy hearing that included testimony from the 
telecommunications, cable, broadcast and Internet sectors. 

Telecommunications and cable executives say they deserve the right 
to create a tiered Internet system. A two-tiered system could, for 
instance, guarantee that all Web sites would be accessible, but 
prioritize streaming video provided by the pipe's owner or business 
partner. 

Michigan Democrat John Dingell saw the fees in a different light, 
saying they amounted to "private taxation of the Internet" an idea 
that he said troubled him. 

"The ones that get hurt are the young innovators, the garage 
innovators, the small-business innovators, the ones that have not 
achieved the great success of the Googles of the world," added Rep. 
Jay Inslee, a Washington Democrat. 

Rep. Rick Boucher, a Virginia Democrat, suggested that the bill 
would benefit from "a provision that says that if a fast lane is 
necessary, perhaps for video or for gaming, then all applications of 
a similar kind...should be entitled to fast-lane access without 
having to pay a charge." 

But one of the new bill's chief sponsors, Texas Republican Joe 
Barton, said he still didn't think it necessary to impose more 
specific Net neutrality regulations until the feuding parties can 
agree on a definition of the concept. (In a conference call with 
reporters on Wednesday, Barton dismissed concerns about Net 
neutrality as overblown.) 

Barton polled each of eight speakers appearing on the first panel at 
Thursday's hearing for a "concise verbal definition" and, after 
receiving an array of responses, implored them to "let your lawyers 
work on it and send it to us in writing." 

*****

US to test 700-tonne explosive
Mar 30, 2006
AFP

The US military plans to detonate a 700 tonne explosive charge in a 
test called "Divine Strake" that will send a mushroom cloud over Las 
Vegas, a senior defense official said. 

"I don't want to sound glib here but it is the first time in Nevada 
that you'll see a mushroom cloud over Las Vegas since we stopped 
testing nuclear weapons," said James Tegnelia, head of the Defense 
Threat Reduction Agency. 

Tegnelia said the test was part of a US effort to develop weapons 
capable of destroying deeply buried bunkers housing nuclear, 
chemical or biological weapons. 

"We have several very large penetrators we're developing," he told 
defense reporters. 

"We also have -- are you ready for this - a 700-tonne explosively 
formed charge that we're going to be putting in a tunnel in Nevada," 
he said. 

"And that represents to us the largest single explosive that we 
could imagine doing conventionally to solve that problem," he said. 

The aim is to measure the effect of the blast on hard granite 
structures, he said. 

"If you want to model these weapons, you want to know from a 
modeling point of view what is the ideal best condition you could 
ever set up in a conventional weapon -- what's the best you can do. 

"And this gets at the best point you could get on a curve. So it 
allows us to predict how effective these kinds of weapons ... would 
be," he said. 

He said the Russians have been notified of the test, which is 
scheduled for the first week of June at the Nevada test range. 

"We're also making sure that Las Vegas understands," Tegnelia said.

***

Published on Friday, March 31, 2006 by the Associated Press  
Plans for Massive Blast in Nevada Draw Fire  
by Kathleen Hennessey 
  
LAS VEGAS - Plans for a Pentagon-led experiment that involves 
detonating 700 tons of explosives in the desert drew criticism from 
state leaders and a disarmament activist.

The explosion scheduled for June 2 at the Nevada Test Site is part 
of an effort to design a weapon that can penetrate solid rock 
formations in which a country might store nuclear weapons or other 
weapons of mass destruction.

"I am concerned that tests of this magnitude have been planned 
without providing Nevadans with any information about the possible 
impact on their health or safety," said Demcratic Sen. Minority 
Leader Harry Reid in a statement Thursday.

Nevada Test Site spokesman Darwin Morgan said the test will be 
conducted about 90 miles northwest of Las Vegas, near the center of 
the former nuclear testing site.

The test, named "Divine Strake," will involve nearly 40 times the 
amount of commercial ammonium nitrate and fuel oil explosive set off 
in the largest open-air, non-nuclear blast at the site to date. In 
2002, 18 tons of explosives were set off at the Nevada Test Site.

"This is nothing that's out of the bounds for us. That's what our 
expertise is in," he said.

Morgan said the site obtained the required state approvals and air 
quality permits in January. Officials from the National Nuclear 
Security Administration, which operates the site, alerted the 
state's congressional delegation and state government in December.

The Nevada Department of Administration responded with a letter 
stating: "Your proposal is not in conflict with state plans, goals 
or objectives."

No elected officials responded to the notice until Thursday, Morgan 
said. The test site is not required to seek public comment, he said.

"Given the level of contamination in areas where nuclear tests were 
conducted, I have real concerns about the dust and other pollutants 
that will be released into the air as a result of this explosion," 
said U.S. Rep. Shelley Berkley.

Disarmament activist Pete Litster said tests at the site violate 
international law. Litster, executive director of the Shundahai 
Network, said the site belongs to the Western Shoshone Indian tribe.

*****

Whitney: She's Broke, and On the Run 
Thursday, March 30, 2006
By Roger Friedman
FoxNews.com

Troubled pop superstar Whitney Houston — once a bigger seller than 
Madonna — is running out of cash. Insiders tell me she is literally 
broke, with no current income and huge expenses.

Not only that: Whitney's life is such a dismal mess that, according 
to sources, her daughter, Bobbi Kristina, is living with Whitney's 
brother Gary and sister-in-law, Pat, close to Houston's home in 
Atlanta.

And it just keeps getting worse: A local Atlanta lawyer told me 
yesterday that he recently had housemates Whitney and `80s pop star 
Cherelle (real name Cheryl Week Norton) evicted from the luxury 
townhouse he'd rented to the latter last fall. Houston's name was 
not on the lease, but the landlord says she was living there and has 
witnesses to back him up.

Now the landlord says he's about to sue both women for about $17,000 
in back rent and about $8,000 in damages for the mess they left 
behind. That includes carpets and furniture ruined by burn marks and 
broken windows. The papers will be filed shortly, he tells me.

When the landlord went to speak to Houston about the noise and filth 
emanating from the townhouse, he told me the singer 
appeared "disheveled" and her voice was gravelly. On the plus 
side: "She was very pleasant."

Houston still owns a beautiful home in suburban Atlanta, but moved 
in with Cherelle at least temporarily last fall.

Houston and Norton, according to my sources, abandoned the befouled 
townhouse and moved to the Atlanta neighborhood of Buckhead. She has 
since returned to her Alpharetta home, where husband Bobby Brown has 
also alighted after having been last seen partying in Los Angeles.

There, Brown told friends alternately that Houston was pregnant and 
that they were divorcing.

Sometimes -- let's face it -- we have fun tweaking the stars. But 
that's not the case with Whitney Houston.

I've known her well since 1989. She was once a beautiful girl with 
the greatest voice in the world and an unlimited future. What's 
happened to her in the last few years is the worst kind of show 
business tragedy. Friends of hers tell me they fear for her life. 
This is a monumental disaster for which no one wants to take 
responsibility.

It doesn't help that this week, Whitney was sold out by her sister-
in-law, Tina Brown (not to be confused with the journalist Tina 
Brown). Tina's brother is Houston's often-arrested and imprisoned 
former pop star husband Bobby.

Tina sold the most salacious stories she could muster to "The 
National Enquirer" and the "UK Sun" tabloid, along with pictures 
that suggest a horrifying saga of Whitney's drug abuse. Her take 
could be as high as $200,000. There has been some suggestion that 
Brown, needing cash, put her up to it.

Ironies abound: First, Whitney entered rehab one year ago. 
Obviously, it didn't work. And second, sources say that Whitney took 
care of Tina Brown's children, said to be six in total, while she 
was in rehab herself.

Even at her worst, Houston, friends say, has tried to keep her 
husband's relatives happy.

"There are 30 members of the Brown family," says an insider, "and 
they've all sponged off of Whitney."

That's the problem. Generous to a fault, Houston has now managed to 
spend most of her earnings taking care of her own family and 
Brown's. She has two main assets: a five-acre estate in posh 
Mendham, N.J., assessed in 2005, according to public records, at 
$5.6 million.

In 2003, she also purchased a large home in Alpharetta for $1.8 
million, almost all of which was borrowed.

"There's no money," says an insider. "She's really broke."

The Mendham property has become to Houston what Neverland is to 
Michael Jackson: a bank account against which she can draw loans. 
Unlike Jackson, however, Houston does not have investments like the 
Beatles catalog to fall back on now that she's in trouble.

Public records show Whitney has borrowed millions of dollars and 
taken out many staggering mortgages in her time — enough to give 
Michael Jackson a run for his money.

The original Mendham home, records show, was bought in 1987 for $2.2 
million; Houston borrowed $1.4 million to pay for it.

In 1998, as part of a refinancing plan, she took a $6.45 million 
mortgage that involved buying a second home in Mendham around the 
corner from the first.

It also appears that she bought a condominium in North Bergen, N.J., 
simultaneously with a $3.4 million mortgage.

In May 2003, Houston obtained a $2 million, 15-year mortgage against 
the Mendham house. At the same time, records show she also took out 
a second equity loan against the same property for $500,000. Three 
months later, there's a new $700,000 mortgage for a different 
property.

Houston's financial problems are simple, and they were easy to 
predict. She is a singer, not a songwriter. Unlike Celine Dion, 
Mariah Carey and Madonna, Houston does not write her own material. 
Or, to be more exact, she never attached her name to her hits and 
took a cut of the publishing. She has only five song credits on 
ASCAP's Web site.

This is rare among modern singers: Almost all of them including 
Barbra Streisand, were smart enough to write some hits of their own. 
And if they didn't, like Bette Midler and Cher, they made their 
stage show a central source of income. One reason Mariah Carey has 
not had to tour extensively is that she has her name on dozens of 
hits.

It's kind of surprising that Houston fell into this trap. She's 
watched both her mother, Cissy Houston, and cousin, Dionne Warwick, 
neither of whom wrote their own hits, tour endlessly every year and 
work to keep up with their expenses. You'd think she would have 
learned something from their experiences.

What's evident is that through the years, Houston has had inadequate 
advice and counsel. Depending on just record sales to get her 
through bad times was a mistake.

While Houston had many bestsellers, they are well in the past. 
Simply singing a hit record is not enough if you're not going to 
save your money.

The real profit in the music business comes from touring and 
publishing. Houston has toured very little in her career. And with 
no songs on her resume, she has no perennial moneymakers on which to 
rely, like Carey's "Vision of Love" and Madonna's "Like A Virgin."

So Whitney, with dozens of dependents and no income, is indeed 
broke. News reports claimed she got a $100 million recording 
contract from Arista Records in 2001. In reality, she received a $20 
million advance. Take half off from taxes, it's $10 million. Another 
$2 million might come off in fees. Then deduct the costs of her 2002 
flop album, "Just Whitney" — which sold just 540,000 copies — and 
her 2004 Christmas album, now ranked on Amazon.com at 68,000. 
Suddenly, it's not so much.

And that doesn't take into account her notorious lifestyle. And I'm 
not talking about the first-class airfare, the nice cars, clothes or 
jewelry. Houston has frittered away millions of dollars living on 
the edge and being irresponsible.

Had she not entered into a spiraling down world of drug addiction, 
and kept recording and touring, she would be —at age 42 — a very 
wealthy woman with a reputation as the best singer of her 
generation. That none of that has come to pass is shameful.

Houston's next big problem is going to be with Child Protective 
Services in Alpharetta. Even though Bobbi Kristina lives away from 
home, there will no doubt be a new investigation based on 
the "Enquirer" story.

If 50 percent of the report is deemed true, Houston and Brown could 
easily lose their daughter for good. One wonders if that will be 
enough of a wake-up call for the singer who once represented the 
best of America's youth.

*****

Actor & Director Ed Asner Shares 9/11 Concerns
Highlights story of hijackers still alive and well
Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet.com | March 31 2006

Award winning director, producer and actor Ed Asner is the latest 
high profile public figure to voice his support for Charlie Sheen's 
stance on 9/11 and share his own concerns about 9/11, the war in 
Iraq and the Neo-Cons.

Speaking to The Alex Jones Show Asner, best known for his Emmy-
winning role as Lou Grant on The Mary Tyler Moore Show, echoed 
Charlie Sheen's sentiments in stating, "I became suspicious of 9/11 
on the day it happened."

"I will always be that suspect of it and challenge it and challenge 
various points of it," said Asner.

Asner agreed that the official story of 9/11 and the Kean Commission 
investigation was a fable and a fraud.

"I do not buy it and I would challenge it, I know all of these 
points....the standing down," said Asner.

Asner questioned why no authority figures had been fired for their 
inability to prevent 9/11.

"Nobody in high office has ever paid the penalty for keeping us 
unprepared for 9/11, no one has paid the price and I cite the fact 
that Abu Ghraib was another typical example of the way this 
government works," said Asner.

"It's very easy to think of 9/11 to think of being yet another cause 
of being able to generate war in this country, " said Asner as he 
compared 9/11 to past examples of manufactured provocations such as 
the Gulf of Tonkin incident, the attack on the Maine and Pearl 
Harbor.

"Many of the purported hijackers are living persons elsewhere," said 
Asner highlighting a story reported by BBC and others that several 
of the so-called perpetrators of 9/11 visited their embassies in 
protest that they had been identified as terrorists.

Asked who gained from 9/11 Asner answered, "Certainly the military 
has, Halliburton, Brown and Root, Mr. Cheney's old outfit....the oil 
companies of course now with record highs, and the White House is of 
course involved with oil and the military and always has been."

Asner doubted that another terror attack needed to be staged in 
order to accomplish more of the same agenda.

"They don't have to have another attack, if they indeed launched the 
first one they have screwed up our country so badly they could just 
let us sink in upon ourselves."

Asner questioned why CNN chose to cancel his scheduled spot on 
Showbiz Tonight. After speaking to inside sources within CNN we were 
able to confirm that the order came down from a higher office 
to "kill" the story, despite the fact that the issue had generated 
the most interest Showbiz Tonight had ever encountered.

Asner is a true humanitarian and is an activist in the fields of 
missing US PoW's, depleted uranium, which Asner suggested was a 
deliberate population reduction method, and the fight to get the FDA 
to eliminate deadly thimerosal mercury additives to vaccines.

His public stance on 9/11 and his support of Charlie Sheen helps in 
the ongoing effort to encourage public figures with large media 
platforms to step forward and become prominent voices for the 9/11 
truth movement. 

*****

THE NEW WORLD OIL ORDER:
HUGO CHAVEZ TELLS BBC, WE HAVE MORE OIL THAN SAUDI ARABIA
Greg Palast Reporting for BBC Newsnight TV
Monday, April 3, 2006

In an exclusive interview with GREG PALAST, Hugo Chávez declares a 
new oil order. 

Venezuela officially demands OPEC recognize his nation's reserves as 
largest. 

Tonight, BBC Newsnight will kick off its Latin America Week Special 
with Palast's exclusive report from Venezuela. 

You can watch the BBC Newsnight Report live at 5.30 pm EST at 
Newsnight's website: 
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/default.stm 

(The report will remain viewable for 24 hours). 

Read below about BBC Newsnight revelations ... 

NO MORE CHEAP OIL SAYS CHAVEZ
BBC Newsnight
Monday April 3, 2006 

If you thought high oil prices were just a blip think again. In an 
exclusive interview with Greg Palast for BBC Newsnight the 
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez has ruled out any return to the era 
of cheap oil. 

The colourful Venezuelan leader hosts the OPEC meeting on June 1 in 
Caracas and he will ask OPEC to set $50 a barrel - the average price 
last year - as the long term level. During the 1990s the price of 
oil had hovered around the $20 mark falling as low as $10 a barrel 
in early 1999. 

Chavez told Newsnight "we're trying to find an equilibrium. The 
price of oil could remain at the low level of $50. That's a fair 
price it's not a high price". Hugo Chavez will have added clout at 
this OPEC meeting. 

US Department of Energy analyses seen by Newsnight show that at $50 
a barrel Venezuela - not Saudi Arabia - will have the biggest oil 
reserves in OPEC. Venezuela has vast deposits of extra heavy oil in 
the Orinoco. Traditionally these have not been counted because at 
$20 a barrel they were too expensive to exploit - but at $50 a 
barrel melting them into liquid petroleum becomes extremely 
profitable. 

The US DoE report shows that at today's prices Venezuela's oil 
reserves are bigger than those of the entire Middle East including 
Saudi Arabia, the Gulf states, Iran and Iraq. The US DoE also 
identifies Canada as another future oil superpower. Venezuela's 
deposits alone could extend the oil age for another 100 years. 

The US DoE estimates that Chavez controls 1.3 trillion barrels of 
oil - more than the entire declared oil reserves of the rest of the 
planet. Hugo Chavez told Newsnight's Greg Palast that "Venezuela has 
the largest oil reserves in the world. In the future Venezuela won't 
have any more oil - but that's in the 22nd century. Venezuela has 
oil for 200 years." Chavez will ask the OPEC meeting in June to 
formally accept that Venezuela's reserves are now bigger than Saudi 
Arabia's. 

Chavez's increased muscle will not go down well in Washington. In 
2002 the Bush administration welcomed an attempted coup against 
Chavez. He told Newsnight that the Americans had organised it in an 
attempt to get hold of Venezuela's oil. 

Ironically by invading Iraq George Bush has boosted oil prices and 
effectively transferred billions of dollars from American consumers 
to Chavez. Up to $200 million a day - half of it from the US - is 
flooding into Caracas. Chavez is spending this on building 
infrastructure and increasing the minimum wage and improving health 
and education in the poor ranchos which surround the cities. As a 
result even his opponents accept that Chavez is extremely popular 
and will easily win the next Presidential election in December. 

Chavez is also spending billions in the rest of Latin America - 
exchanging contracts for oil tankers and infrastructure projects and 
buying up loans in Argentina and Brazil. He has made cheap oil deals 
with Ecuador and the Caribbean. 

He has also spent some of the dollars which have come in from the US 
supporting Fidel Castro in Cuba. In return Cuba has supplied the 
thousands of doctors and teachers who are transforming conditions in 
the barrios of Caracas. Washington accuses Chavez of buying 
influence in Latin America. 

The Newsnight team had to endure the long speeches and marathon six 
hour TV shows which Hugo Chavez delights in. Chavez posed for 
Newsnight posing with the sword of Simon Bolivar the 18th century 
liberator who drove out Spanish imperialists from South America. The 
symbolism was clear but behind the showman is a clever political 
brain. 

Chavez has not invaded any foreign countries. He does not have 
secret prisons at home or abroad. Chavez has repeatedly won 
democratic elections and the opposition operates freely although 
some members have been charged with accepting illegal foreign 
donations. Nonetheless George Bush's administration repeatedly 
targets Chavez on human rights and finances his opponents. 

Earlier this year US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld compared 
Chavez to Hitler - because he was elected democratically - and last 
year the influential American evangelist Pat Robertson called for 
his assassination. Robertson later apologized and said that he did 
not "necessarily" have to be killed so long as he was kidnapped by 
American special forces. 

Chavez told Newsnight that he was still concerned that George Bush 
had not learnt the lessons of Iraq and would order an invasion to 
try to secure Venezuela's oil. "I pray this will not happen because 
US soldiers will bite the dust and so will we, Venezuelans". He 
warned that any such attempt would lead to a prolonged guerilla war 
and an end to oil production. "The US people should know there will 
be no oil for anyone". 

Chavez does not accept Tony Blair's criticism of him for lining up 
with Fidel Castro. He told Newsnight "if someone is sleeping 
together it is Bush and Blair. They share the same bed." 

--
Also see The Guardian story about the report: 
http://business.guardian.co.uk/story/0,,1745467,00.html   

Read, "The Assassination of Hugo Chavez," in Greg Palast's new 
book, "ARMED MADHOUSE: Dispatches from the Front Lines of the Class 
War" to be released by Penguin Dutton June 6 (US) and July 7 (UK). 

Pre-order it today or donate to Palast Investigative Fund for a 
personally signed copy at: 
http://www.gregpalast.com/armedmadhouse/preorder.html 

View Palast's investigative reports for Harper's Magazine and BBC 
Television's Newsnight at http://www.GregPalast.com  

Special thanks to Matt Pascarella, Leni von Eckardt, and Richard 
Rowley for their research and production assistance on this report.









The Konformist must make a request for donations via Paypal, at Paypal.com. If 
you can and desire, please feel free to send money to help The Konformist 
through the following email address:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

If you are interested in a free subscription to The Konformist Newswire, please 
visit:

http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/konformist

Or, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject: "I NEED 2 KONFORM!!!"

(Okay, you can use something else, but it's a kool catch phrase.)

Visit the Klub Konformist at Yahoo!: 

http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/klubkonformist 
 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 




--- End Message ---

Reply via email to