> From: Alan Wright [mailto:alan.wri...@oracle.com]
>
> ...
Thank you.
FWIW, I'm aware of the difference in behavior if finding snapshots based on
inode versus assuming unchanged pathname/filename. The path/filename is
much more easily implemented, due to the general lack of ability to reverse
Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
From: Afshin Salek [mailto:afshin.sa...@oracle.com]
Here are some pointers:
usr/src/uts/common/fs/smbsrv/smb_vss.c (smb kernel module)
usr/src/cmd/smbsrv/smbd/smbd_vss.c (smbd daemon)
Is it really difficult just to say "It's based on path and filename" or
"It's based
> From: Afshin Salek [mailto:afshin.sa...@oracle.com]
>
> Here are some pointers:
>
> usr/src/uts/common/fs/smbsrv/smb_vss.c (smb kernel module)
> usr/src/cmd/smbsrv/smbd/smbd_vss.c (smbd daemon)
Is it really difficult just to say "It's based on path and filename" or
"It's based on inodes" or "
Here are some pointers:
usr/src/uts/common/fs/smbsrv/smb_vss.c (smb kernel module)
usr/src/cmd/smbsrv/smbd/smbd_vss.c (smbd daemon)
Afshin
On 05/ 5/10 01:17 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
From: Afshin Salek [mailto:afshin.sa...@oracle.com]
Solaris is open source, you can always take a look at t
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Afshin Salek wrote:
> Solaris is open source, you can always take a look at the
> code to see what it does ;-)
Easy to say, but I suspect that trawling through what, 20 million lines
of unfamiliar code, or is it more now, is likely to prove frustrating to
most.
Ha
> From: Afshin Salek [mailto:afshin.sa...@oracle.com]
>
> Solaris is open source, you can always take a look at the
> code to see what it does ;-)
That's not helpful. ;-)
I've been trying to do that, but I'm overwhelmed by the massive code, and
total unfamiliarity with all the thousands of sour
Solaris is open source, you can always take a look at the
code to see what it does ;-)
Afshin
On 05/ 5/10 10:17 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
From: Alan Wright [mailto:alan.wri...@oracle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 6:28 PM
Is this a curiosity question or are you trying to implement
support
> From: Alan Wright [mailto:alan.wri...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 6:28 PM
>
> Is this a curiosity question or are you trying to implement
> support for Previous Versions?
>
> Have you looked at the spec and/or what Windows clients do
> when you view Previous Versions?
I don't kno
Is this a curiosity question or are you trying to implement
support for Previous Versions?
Have you looked at the spec and/or what Windows clients do
when you view Previous Versions?
Alan
On 05/ 4/10 06:02 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
This may be a simple question, or it may be hugely complex.
