Good morning Mr. Simpkins. Bill Wesse here from the Protocols Documentation
team.
I have taken ownership of the new case (SRX080803600053) I created for your
question. I will begin my investigation this morning and update you on my
progress before the end of the day.
Regards,
Bill Wesse
MCSE /
Good morning once again. You noted in your question that you can provide a
network trace of the NTLM behavior you reported. I would deeply appreciate it
if you would send one to me. Could you also note the OS versions of the client
and server (just in case, even though the NtlmsspAuthenticaeMess
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 04:17:29AM -0700, Bill Wesse wrote:
> Good morning once again. You noted in your question that you can
> provide a network trace of the NTLM behavior you reported. I would
> deeply appreciate it if you would send one to me. Could you also
> note the OS versions of the client
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 01:48:37PM -0700, Adam Simpkins wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 04:17:29AM -0700, Bill Wesse wrote:
> > Good morning once again. You noted in your question that you can
> > provide a network trace of the NTLM behavior you reported. I would
> > deeply appreciate it if you wo
On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 14:28 -0700, Richard Guthrie wrote:
> I will be working with your issue. I need to review some material so that I
> understand your request. I will get back to you shortly with an
> update/questions.
While I think this structure could do with better documentation, I don't
I can't find any reference in either MS-ADTS or MS-KILE regarding the
salt used for for the different types of principals in the kerberos
protocol. (A salt is used as a confounded in string2key operations in
kerberos)
I know there are different salt calculations for users and computers,
and presu
