Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers

2009-07-20 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 06:30 -0700, Bill Wesse wrote: > Good morning Andrew! > > There is no copyright license for the attachments - yet; nevertheless, I > expect the below text - or something like it - to apply. Bill, Honestly, this really isn't very useful. I can search against an AD server

Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers

2009-07-20 Thread Bill Wesse
Good morning Andrew! There is no copyright license for the attachments - yet; nevertheless, I expect the below text - or something like it - to apply. I cannot guarantee there will be no changes between now and when the CAR request is fulfilled. I certainly expect this will not take as long as

[cifs-protocol] Clarify reserved bytes that are in fact used in LogonSamLogonEx response

2009-07-20 Thread Andrew Bartlett
G'day, My friend in Samba development Matthieu has been chasing down small but possibly significant differences between Samba4 and Windows. He is puzzled by the following, and we wondered if you might be able to shed some light on the matter. Thanks, Andrew Bartlett Original Message -

Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers

2009-07-20 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 18:15 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 07:38 -0700, Bill Wesse wrote: > > Tridge - every out of band release has a unique Intellectual Property > > notice. So the notice that was included in the schema is unique, and > > pertains only to the schema release

Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers

2009-07-20 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 07:38 -0700, Bill Wesse wrote: > Tridge - every out of band release has a unique Intellectual Property > notice. So the notice that was included in the schema is unique, and > pertains only to the schema release that we provided (it can be > obtained on the 'Microsoft Open Spe