Re: [cifs-protocol] Bug in MS-WINSRA section "2.2.10.1 Name Record"

2010-02-12 Thread Edgar Olougouna
Stefan, Regarding the issue you raised on replicating a name with a length of 255, we have not observed the behavior between Windows-based WINS replication partners. We need you reproduce the issue in your environment and send us the network trace and time travel tracing (TTT). I created th

Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies in ad-schema docs and text files SRX090109601490

2010-02-12 Thread Hongwei Sun
Tridge/Andrew, We are in the process to update our MS-ADA* documents to reflect all the changes you made to the schema. I just want to confirm how you got these changes and if all these changes are essential. Your comments in diff below mentioned only the typos. "The schema fr

Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies in ad-schema docs and text files SRX090109601490

2010-02-12 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 22:55 +, Hongwei Sun wrote: > Tridge/Andrew, > > We are in the process to update our MS-ADA* documents to reflect all the > changes you made to the schema. I just want to confirm how you got these > changes and if all these changes are essential. Your comments in

Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies in ad-schema docs and text files SRX090109601490

2010-02-12 Thread Hongwei Sun
Thanks for the clarification! It helps a lot. Do you mean "identical" to the Windows 2008 R2 schema implemented on a windows DC ? Does "Exact Value comparison" mean to compare the elements between the schema file we sent you and a real Windows 2008 R2 schema ? Hongwei -Original Mes

Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies in ad-schema docs and text files SRX090109601490

2010-02-12 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 00:32 +, Hongwei Sun wrote: > Thanks for the clarification! It helps a lot. Do you mean "identical" > to the Windows 2008 R2 schema implemented on a windows DC ? Yes. > Does "Exact Value comparison" mean to compare the elements between > the schema file we sent yo