Hi Matthieu:
In the context of MS-ADTS, the general convention is that the term “parent”
means the immediate parent and term “ancestor” means immediate parent as well
as indirect parents.
The term parent in the text from section 3.1.1.5.2 that you inquired about
adheres to the above definitio
Hi Metze:
I have taken the ownership of this question and I'll be in touch as soon as I
have an answer.
Regards,
Obaid Farooqi
Escalation Engineer | Microsoft
Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to
provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at
a
Hi Matthieu:
I am still waiting for network traces for this behavior.
Regards,
Obaid Farooqi
Escalation Engineer | Microsoft
Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to
provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at
allis...@microsoft.com
-Origin
[dochelp to bcc]
[adding casemail and case number]
Hi, Metze,
Thank you for your question. An engineer from the protocols team will pick
this up soon.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher [mailto:me...@samba.org]
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2011 7:06 AM
To: Interoper
Hi,
I found that objects with "ss" and "ß" in the DN conflict with each other.
e.g.:
If I create CN=User_ß,OU=test,DC=example,DC=com on DC1
and CN=User_ss,OU=test,DC=example,DC=com on DC2,
CN=User_ss,OU=test,DC=example,DC=com gets renamed to
CN=User_ß\x0aCNF:ee47b3a2-c1c5-11e0-a500-1b2ff2ce35e2,
