Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:113041210363439] RE: [MS-CIFS] Windows Note 246.

2013-05-05 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
481EA8-2691-4873-8A80-F8CFF3297746@domain.actdsltmp > P+1 469 775 7849 > One Microsoft Way, 98052, Redmond, WA, USA http://support.microsoft.com > <http://support.microsoft.com/> > > > > *From:*Sebastian Canevari > *Sent:* Monday, April 29, 2013 4:35 PM > *To:* Christ

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:113041210363439] RE: [MS-CIFS] Windows Note 246.

2013-04-29 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
soon. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at nkang at Microsoft dot com -Original Message- From: Christopher R. Hertel [mailto:c

[cifs-protocol] [MS-CIFS] Windows Note 246.

2013-04-12 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
://support.microsoft.com/kb/150384 Oh... and there's a typo in the first sentence of the note. The word "check" should be "checks". Chris -)- -- "Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)-

[cifs-protocol] Errors in [MS-CIFS] relating to Process Exit.

2012-05-29 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
e. Thanks. Chris -)- -- "Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)----- Christopher R. Hertel jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq. ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112030256125953] [MS-CIFS] PendingRequestTable issues.

2012-03-04 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
nt: Friday, March 02, 2012 8:51 AM To: Christopher R. Hertel; cifs-proto...@samba.org; p...@tridgell.net Cc: MSSolve Case Email Subject: [REG:112030256125953] [MS-CIFS] PendingRequestTable issues. [dochelp to bcc] [adding casemail and case number] Hi Chris. We created SR 112030256125953 to track

Re: [cifs-protocol] [MS-CIFS] PendingRequestTable issues.

2012-03-01 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
, SID should be CID in that note. The note is otherwise correct.) Chris -)- -- "Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx d

Re: [cifs-protocol] clarification of MaxMpx value in MS-CIFS

2012-03-01 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
m" ISBN: 013047116X Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq. ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- c...@ubiqx.mn.org OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.or

[cifs-protocol] [MS-CIFS] PendingRequestTable issues.

2012-03-01 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
otherwise correct.) Chris -)- -- "Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq. ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -

[cifs-protocol] Incomplete information in [MS-PCCRC: 3.1, 3.2]

2012-02-22 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
op Lab, so I'm a little surprised that it has not been addressed. I'll be there next week too. Chris -)- -- "Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel jCIFS Team -- http:

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111122854095339] Note regarding SMB_COM_NEGOTIATE

2011-12-28 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
s. > > Bryan > > -Original Message- > From: Christopher R. Hertel [mailto:c...@samba.org] > Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2011 5:22 PM > To: cifs-proto...@samba.org; Interoperability Documentation Help > Subject: Note regarding SMB_COM_NEGOTIATE > > Dear DocH

[cifs-protocol] Note regarding SMB_COM_NEGOTIATE

2011-12-27 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq. ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- c...@ubiqx.mn.org OnLi

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111120724281237] SMB2 ProcessId header field for SYNC messages.

2011-12-23 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
at > allis...@microsoft.com > > -Original Message- > From: Obaid Farooqi > Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 1:57 PM > To: Christopher R. Hertel > Cc: MSSolve Case Email; cifs-proto...@samba.org; Bryan Burgin > Subject: RE:[REG:20724281237] [cifs-protocol] SMB2 P

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111120724281237] SMB2 ProcessId header field for SYNC messages.

2011-12-12 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
EPLY if you want your response added to the > case automatically. For technical assistance, please include the Support > Engineer on the TO: line. Thank you. > > ___________ > cifs-protocol mailing list > cifs-protocol@cifs.org > https:/

[cifs-protocol] SMB2 ProcessId header field for SYNC messages.

2011-12-06 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
Dochelp, Hi. The SYNC version of the SMB2 message header has a ProcessId field, which is described in [MS-SMB2] v20110920, section 2.2.1.2, pg30, as follows: ProcessId (4 bytes): The client-side identification of the process that issued the request. The client MUST set this field to 0xFEFF

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:11100564603264] [MS-NBTE] and NetBIOS name case.

2011-10-05 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
-----Original Message----- > From: Christopher R. Hertel [mailto:c...@ubiqx.mn.org] > Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 10:48 AM > To: Interoperability Documentation Help; cifs-proto...@samba.org; > p...@tridgell.net > Subject: [MS-NBTE] and NetBIOS name case. > > In [MS-NBT

[cifs-protocol] [MS-NBTE] and NetBIOS name case.

2011-10-05 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
quot;, but I cannot find such information in [MS-NBTE]. Chris -)- ...and it's NBT, not NetBT. No one calls it NetBT except the doc author. -- "Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R.

Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] Maximum Simultaneous Request for CIFS behavior clarification

2011-09-29 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
us versions of MS-CIFS there were mentions of different >> processes, and uids on the negotiated tcp session and their relation >> to the MaxMpxCount - and I would also like to verify whether the >> limits are considered relative to some combination of the negotiated >> tcp

[cifs-protocol] Minor table header bug in [MS-CIFS] v20110610 (June 10, 2011)

2011-08-04 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee441466%28PROT.13%29.aspx Let me know if you have questions. Chris -)- -- "Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs

Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: [REG:111061756137964] Encryption of the key for "netsh branchcache importkey and exportkey.

2011-07-07 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
to use the term "Server Passphrase" as the name for the "arbitrary length binary string stored on the server". No name is given in the docs. Chris -)- -- "Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/

Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: [REG:111061756137964] Encryption of the key for "netsh branchcache importkey and exportkey.

2011-07-07 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
he Server Secret are provided in the extracted key blob. Chris -)----- Christopher R. Hertel wrote: > One more note. > > The extracted Server Secret is 32 bytes in length and is a binary string > (clearly neither Unicode nor OEM Charset). > > My guess, at this point, is tha

Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: [REG:111061756137964] Encryption of the key for "netsh branchcache importkey and exportkey.

2011-07-06 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
you need further assistance on the > open specifications. > > Regards, > Edgar > -- "Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)

Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: [REG:111061756137964] Encryption of the key for "netsh branchcache importkey and exportkey.

2011-07-05 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
)- On 07/05/2011 02:51 PM, Christopher R. Hertel wrote: Thanks, Edgar. That's another critical piece of information. I will keep working with this. Chris -)- Edgar Olougouna wrote: Hi Chris, Just a quick follow-up, the block size is 16. Thanks, Edgar -- "Implementi

Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: [REG:111061756137964] Encryption of the key for "netsh branchcache importkey and exportkey.

2011-07-05 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
stem" ISBN: 013047116X Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq. ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- c...@ubiqx.mn.org OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/

Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: [REG:111061756137964] Encryption of the key for "netsh branchcache importkey and exportkey.

2011-07-04 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
ding. > > Regards, > Edgar -- "Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq. ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.or

Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: [REG:111061756137964] Encryption of the key for "netsh branchcache importkey and exportkey.

2011-06-24 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
Edgar, et. al., I am attaching two things: 1) The key file I am trying to decrypt. Filename: export-key.pw-is-foo.nc This is the Windows-produced file that I need to decrypt. The passphrase I used to extract this file using netsh was "foo". 2) The code that I am currently using to tr

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111061070310825] RE: [MS-PCCRC]: Handling of multi-range Range: headers is undefined.

2011-06-22 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
> Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to > provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at > allis...@microsoft.com > > -Original Message- > From: Christopher R. Hertel [mailto:c...@ubiqx.mn.org] > Sent: Tuesday, June

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111061756137964] Encryption of the key for "netsh branchcache??? importkey and exportkey.

2011-06-22 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
gt; The plaintext buffer is ( [32-bytes SHA256(X)] + X). However, because the > encryption adds some overhead, the encrypted file may be slightly longer than > the plaintext buffer. Therefore, the secret in this scenario is not > necessarily 48 bytes in length. > > Regards, &

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111061070310825] RE: [MS-PCCRC]: Handling of multi-range Range: headers is undefined.

2011-06-21 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
Obaid, I have a concern about the wording of the sample text your team provided. It is not necessary for the Branchcache content information format to support multi-range requests. The response to a multi-range request could clearly be sent as separate content information messages in a multi-

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111061756137964] Encryption of the key for "netsh branchcache” importkey and exportkey.

2011-06-18 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
hing basic that I'm missing... like the IV. Chris -)- Christopher R. Hertel wrote: > Okay, never mind the IV part. I don't think that the IV actually makes a > difference when decrypting. > > ...but I could be wrong. > > Christopher R. Hertel wrote: >> Edga

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111061756137964] Encryption of the key for "netsh branchcache” importkey and exportkey.

2011-06-18 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
Okay, never mind the IV part. I don't think that the IV actually makes a difference when decrypting. ...but I could be wrong. Christopher R. Hertel wrote: > Edgar, > > There is a little more information that I will need in order to make this > work. In particular, the AES enc

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111051857287367] BranchCache and SMB2: Questions specific to BranchCache.

2011-06-09 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
escriptions of these values to be difficult to interpret when reading the documentation. Unless you tell me that my understanding, given above, is incorrect I believe that your description has clarified things nicely. Thanks. Chris -)- > Regards, > Edgar > > -Original M

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111051857287367] BranchCache and SMB2: Questions specific to BranchCache.

2011-05-18 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
Christopher R. Hertel wrote: > Edgar, > > Before I send the captures, here is an analysis I did. I simply copied > the raw hex values from Wireshark, so the numeric values are displayed > in wire order. > > Note that there are only two differences between the MS IIS outpu

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111051857287367] BranchCache and SMB2: Questions specific to BranchCache.

2011-05-18 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
t;Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq. ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- c...@ubiqx.mn.org OnLin

[cifs-protocol] BranchCache and SMB2: Questions specific to BranchCache.

2011-05-17 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
Chris -)- -- "Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq. ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- c.

Re: [cifs-protocol] How to get started on writing a protocol for a printer server?

2011-05-17 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
ocol documentation. Chris -)- -- "Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq. ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiq

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 110121779812865] Requesting clarification of CIFS client timeout behavior

2010-12-17 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
the two docs now disagree with one another. Chris -)- > Thanks again for your feedback! > Edgar > > -Original Message- > From: Christopher R. Hertel [mailto:c...@samba.org] > Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 5:51 PM > To: Edgar Olougouna > Cc: Jeff Layton; p...@

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 110121055487273] Requesting clarification of CIFS client timeout behavior

2010-12-16 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
ed as specified in [MS-CIFS] section 3.2.3. > > Thanks, > Edgar > > -Original Message- > From: Edgar Olougouna > Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 10:15 AM > To: 'Christopher R. Hertel'; Jeff Layton > Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSo

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 110120160951867] Requesting clarification of CIFS client timeout behavior

2010-12-09 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
ds. Chris -)- -- "Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq. ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)---

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 110120160951867] Requesting clarification of CIFS client timeout behavior

2010-12-07 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
ands is scanned every 30 seconds, so the timeout condition may not be detected until 30 seconds after the timeout has actually occurred. Chris -)- -- "Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christop

Re: [cifs-protocol] cifs client timeouts and hard/soft mounts

2010-12-07 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
Of Volker Lendecke > Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 12:17 PM > To: Christopher R. Hertel > Cc: Steve French; cifs-proto...@samba.org; samba-techni...@lists.samba.org; > Jeff Layton; linux-c...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: cifs client timeouts and hard/soft mounts > > On Mo

Re: [cifs-protocol] cifs client timeouts and hard/soft mounts

2010-12-06 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
Christopher R. Hertel wrote: > Steve French wrote: > : >> Now that I have experimented with smb2, it does seem better (and the >> alternatives are worse) > > Yeah... but they're already headed down the same road that they took with > SMB. Let's see where S

Re: [cifs-protocol] cifs client timeouts and hard/soft mounts

2010-12-06 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
et José ready to take over for us when we're shipped off to the home. Chris -)- -- "Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)-

Re: [cifs-protocol] cifs client timeouts and hard/soft mounts

2010-12-06 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
Volker Lendecke wrote: > On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 12:54:30PM -0600, Christopher R. Hertel wrote: >> There are a lot of companies out there that do WAN acceleration and each of >> them do things differently, so there is no good answer to your quite >> rational question. Some of

Re: [cifs-protocol] cifs client timeouts and hard/soft mounts

2010-12-06 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
Jeff Layton wrote: > On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 11:01:12 -0600 > "Christopher R. Hertel" wrote: > >> Question (for which I do not have an answer): How much work do you want to >> do to make their intentionally broken model work? >> > > Very little...live by

Re: [cifs-protocol] cifs client timeouts and hard/soft mounts

2010-12-06 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
e as generic as possible so that it works well in all environments. Chris -)----- -- "Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx dev

Re: [cifs-protocol] cifs client timeouts and hard/soft mounts

2010-12-06 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
some pain is deserved :-) > > Aaah - remember the proxies that cut out "chatty" smb traffic by > responding on behalf of remote servers in the interest of optimizing > traffic over slow links :) > > -- "Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISB

Re: [cifs-protocol] cifs client timeouts and hard/soft mounts

2010-12-04 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
the 45 second timeout and point at the related KB articles. Chris -)- -- "Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx develo

Re: [cifs-protocol] cifs client timeouts and hard/soft mounts

2010-12-04 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
Jeff Layton wrote: > On Sat, 4 Dec 2010 09:13:21 +0100 > Volker Lendecke wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 09:54:13PM -0600, Christopher R. Hertel wrote: >>> That may seem to be in the "who cares" category, since those old transports >>> are essenti

Re: [cifs-protocol] cifs client timeouts and hard/soft mounts

2010-12-04 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
Jeff Layton wrote: > On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 21:54:13 -0600 > "Christopher R. Hertel" wrote: > >> Jeff Layton wrote: >> : >> : >>> Timeouts: >>> = >>> It's tempting to think of SMB as being very similar to NFS/RPC

Re: [cifs-protocol] cifs client timeouts and hard/soft mounts

2010-12-04 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
Volker Lendecke wrote: > On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 09:54:13PM -0600, Christopher R. Hertel wrote: >> That may seem to be in the "who cares" category, since those old transports >> are essentially dead (much more dead than NBT, or even NBF). Unfortunately, >> the code

Re: [cifs-protocol] cifs client timeouts and hard/soft mounts

2010-12-03 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
things like the timeouts you're talking about and the weird VC=0 shutdown behvior -- that exist because of these old disused transports. Ugh. Eh? Chris -)- -- "Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 110120160951867] Requesting clarification of CIFS client timeout behavior

2010-12-03 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
-)- Jeff Layton wrote: > On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 16:08:32 -0600 > "Christopher R. Hertel" wrote: > > [...] > >> Probably needs two tests. One to see what happens if the (single) >> connection is lost, and another to see what happens if a single operation &g

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 110120160951867] Requesting clarification of CIFS client timeout behavior

2010-12-01 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
Below... Jeff Layton wrote: > On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 14:44:44 -0600 > "Christopher R. Hertel" wrote: > >> Jeff Layton wrote: >> : >>> Yes, this is probably stretching the definition of protocol >>> clarification, but I figured it wouldn't hurt

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 110120160951867] Requesting clarification of CIFS client timeout behavior

2010-12-01 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
. ...but that's guess-work based upon my memory. The real answer is in the Windows source and I don't have access to that any more (thank goodness!). Chris -)- -- "Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 110120160951867] Requesting clarification of CIFS client timeout behavior

2010-12-01 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
dows behave similarly? > > -- > Jeff Layton > ___ > cifs-protocol mailing list > cifs-protocol@cifs.org > https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol > ___ > cif

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110110481276509] Please include bitfield names in MS-NRPC LogonParameters

2010-11-05 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
integer value of the sub-authentication package >> identifier (this is in little-endian order). > > eg: > > A: 0x0002: MSV1_0_CLEARTEXT_PASSWORD_ALLOWED: Clear text passwords can be > transmitted for this logon identity. > > Andrew Bartlett > -- "Implementing

Re: [cifs-protocol] Which MS doc covers CLDAP and its uses?

2010-08-24 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
(0)790 425 us mob +1425 647 0094 > email: neil.mar...@microsoft.com > > > -Original Message- > From: cifs-protocol-boun...@cifs.org [mailto:cifs-protocol-boun...@cifs.org] > On Behalf Of Christopher R. Hertel > Sent: 24 August 2010 17:04 > To: cifs-proto...@samb

Re: [cifs-protocol] Which MS doc covers CLDAP and its uses?

2010-08-24 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
-read [MS-MAIL] for the nth time. Chris -)- Christopher R. Hertel wrote: > I am particularly interested, at present, in the \MAILSLOT\NET\NETLOGON > mailslot, and its kin. > > Chris -)- > -- "Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X Samba Team -

[cifs-protocol] Which MS doc covers CLDAP and its uses?

2010-08-23 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
I am particularly interested, at present, in the \MAILSLOT\NET\NETLOGON mailslot, and its kin. Chris -)- -- "Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs

Re: [cifs-protocol] 2010 SNIA CIFS Plugfest

2010-07-26 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
Typo. Change "Sun/Oracle" to "CompanyX". My apologies. I did not mean to single anyone out. Chris -)----- Christopher R. Hertel wrote: > Some additional notes regarding the rules: > > Each company or organization gets at least two free Plugfest attendees. &

Re: [cifs-protocol] 2010 SNIA CIFS Plugfest

2010-07-26 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
le of participating .orgs/companies.) 3) SDC attendees who are NOT Plugfest participants pay the posted conference rates. Contact Arnold (information below) if you have *any* questions. Chris -)- Christopher R. Hertel wrote: > As I am sure you are aware... > > Registration for the

[cifs-protocol] 2010 SNIA CIFS Plugfest

2010-07-25 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
3047116X Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)----- Christopher R. Hertel jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq. ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- c...@ubiqx.mn.org OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/

Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX091209600095 [MS-SMB] error returns

2010-01-27 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
; Charlotte, NC 28273 > Email:bil...@microsoft.com > Tel: +1(980) 776-8200 > Cell: +1(704) 661-5438 > Fax: +1(704) 665-9606 > > > -Original Message- > From: Bill Wesse > Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 2:45 PM > To: 'Christopher R. Her

Re: [cifs-protocol] STATUS_OS2_INVALID_LEVEL

2010-01-14 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
would be > pretty big. Perhaps a KB article that we can reference from a WB? > > There I go again. Another understatement. :) Chris -)----- > -- > "Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X > Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)-

[cifs-protocol] STATUS_OS2_INVALID_LEVEL

2010-01-13 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
cifs-protocol list a while back and can't seem to get re-registered so please make sure I'm in the CC list if you respond. -- "Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel jC

Re: [cifs-protocol] RE: SMB_COM_TRANSACTION_SECONDARY wct wrong for TRANS2

2008-09-11 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
> > Volker > ___ > cifs-protocol mailing list > cifs-protocol@cifs.org > https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol -- "Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem"ISBN: 013047116X Samba Team -- http://