On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 12:42:55PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 11:01:12 -0600
> "Christopher R. Hertel" wrote:
>
> >
> > Question (for which I do not have an answer): How much work do you want to
> > do to make their intentionally broken model work?
> >
>
> Very little...l
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 06:22:01PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
>
> Treating different calls differently for timeouts sounds like the road
> to special-case madness. It seems to me that the best behavior would be
> to have the client wait for a reply indefinitely if the server is
> responding to peri
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 05:07:42PM +, Bryan Burgin wrote:
> Hi, Jeremy,
>
> I'm just touching base as we are back from the Thanksgiving holiday and the
> weather that practically shut Seattle down last week. I wanted to check that
> you received the files I sent last week (Time Travel Trace
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 12:09:39AM +, Bryan Burgin wrote:
> Jeremy,
>
> I'm researching this for you. I worked with Guenther on similar
> [MS-RPRN]questions during the Samba IO Lab, along with Nick and Tarun from
> Microsoft and the Product Group.
>
> The two most detailed debugging techni
Hi Dochelp,
Hongwei and Nick suggested I post this here,
I'm trying to track down an interoperability bug
with Samba and the Windows 7 print subsystem.
When doing "connect" to a remote printer from
Windows 7 with our latest auto-generated PIDL
code (git master branch) it downloads the
printer dr
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 08:54:36PM +, David Wooden wrote:
> Sorry for the re-send, adding our internal tool alias for tracking these
> issues.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Wooden
> Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 12:52 PM
> To: Jeremy Allison
> Cc:
Dear Dochelp,
In MS-RPRN, section : 3.1.4.1.2 Dynamically Typed Query Parameters.
the text reads:
3.1.4.1.2 Dynamically Typed Query Parameters
Unless notified otherwise, methods returning one or more dynamically-typed
values use
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:08:15PM -0500, Gordon Ross wrote:
> Connectathon 2010 is coming soon! This will include a
> CIFS plug-fest to be held Feb. 22-25.
>
> We'd like to invite everyone with CIFS implementations
> to the CIFS plug-fest at Connectathon. See this site:
> http://www.connectat
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 05:14:26PM +, Bill Wesse wrote:
> Hello Tim. I think the difference in the response between the standard versus
> pass-through level lies in how the file handle is obtained during the call
> (given that TRANS2_SET_PATH_INFORMATION passes the path, and not the handle).
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:22:44PM +, Hongwei Sun wrote:
> Jeremy,
>
>Just want to check with you to see if the information is helpful for you
> to identify the problem. If you need any more information or help from our
> side, please let us know.
Sorry, I've been on vacation for a week
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:25:57PM +, Hongwei Sun wrote:
> Jeremy,
>
>
>
> After much of testing and debugging, it seems that we are getting the
> cause
> why Windows takes the file offline and the timestamp update only goes to local
> store. When Windows close one particular handle
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 05:34:39AM +, Hongwei Sun wrote:
> Jeremy,
>
>We are still working on identifying the issue. It seems that when Excel
> tries to send SET_INFO when closing the file, CSC thinks ,for some reason,
> that the object is in disconnected offline state and any update to
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 02:57:44AM +, Hongwei Sun wrote:
> Jeremy,
>
>Just a quick update. I have duplicated the exactly same behavior as you
> reported, which makes live debugging possible. We are actively working on
> it. I will keep you posted.
Great ! I'm in the process of adding
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 11:39:38AM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 11:33:41AM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I believe there is an error in [MS-SMB2] — v20090521 in the
> > description of 2.2.4 SMB2 NEGOTIATE Response.
> >
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 11:33:41AM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I believe there is an error in [MS-SMB2] — v20090521 in the
> description of 2.2.4 SMB2 NEGOTIATE Response.
>
> At the end of this section on page 35 it says:
>
> "Buffer (variable): Th
to using raw-NTLMSSP
blobs for sessionsetup instead of SPNEGO wrapped blobs.
I can provide proof of this as a packet trace on request.
I think this is important to fix for the SMB2 client implementations,
which otherwise are forced to implement SPNEGO ASN.1 parsing.
Jeremy Allison,
Sa
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 05:30:54PM -0700, Long Li wrote:
> Can you tell us how you use SMBTorture BASE, RAW and SMB2 test suites in the
> Samba project? Is there any documentation that we should use to properly setup
> the Samba server in the test?
Well we mainly use it to determine where we're d
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 09:33:14AM -0700, James Peach wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I had some time a couple of months ago, so I knocked up some
> documentation for the UNIX extensions.
>
> Although what follows is in RFC format, I doubt that I will get around
> to submitting this as a real IETF informa
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 06:39:34AM -0700, Bill Wesse wrote:
> Just resending this in case you missed my earlier email.
Bill,
Just FYI: Andrew is on vacation this week.
Thanks,
Jeremy.
___
cifs-protocol mailing list
cifs-protocol@cifs.o
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 05:35:39PM -0400, Wagner, Chris (GE Infra, Non-GE, US)
wrote:
> Which brings us back to my suggestion of requiring backslashes only and any
> client in POSIX mode just has to deal with it, flip the slashes. Embedded
> backslash literals then have to be escaped. I think
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 09:49:04AM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
>
> Jeremy Allison schrieb:
> >
> > Yes, that's exactly what I'm coding up right now.
> > Wait for the check-in :-).
>
> good:-)
Actually, this proved much harder than I thought
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 12:14:48AM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
>
> can't we out that logic into the client, so when the client
> get the redirect from a server with unix extentions then
> it converts the redirect url when he talks to a server without
> unix extentions support.
Yes, th
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 05:26:47PM -0500, simo wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 12:36 -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 08:40:12PM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > Hash: SHA1
> >
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 08:40:12PM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jeremy Allison schrieb:
> > which is incorrect. Now that's easy to fix, but
> > the problem is when the client is in unix extension
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 03:45:42PM -0500, Wagner, Chris (GE Infra, Non-GE, US)
wrote:
> I think this needs some clarification. I'm not a samba/cifs developer but I
> would be in the "implementor" category. Can u give some examples of the
> backslash occuring in an ambiguous place? I'm assumin
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 02:33:27PM -0500, simo wrote:
>
> Think about a samba server with home directories of this kind (very
> possible if you use winbindd):
>
> /home/DOMAIN1\user1
> /home/DOMAIN1\user2
> /home/DOMAIN2\userX1
> /home/DOMAIN2\userX2
That's why the winbindd defaults are : /home/
Currently the Samba server parsing code
treats '\\' as a directory separator even
when posix pathnames is set to true.
This means currently that we're not 100%
POSIX as '\\' is valid in a POSIX pathname,
the only banned characters are '/' and '\0'.
How much of a problem is this ? And how
much eff
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 12:41:38PM -0600, Steve French wrote:
> After looking at a few posts complaining about Linux cifs performance
> vs. nfs, Shaggy and I looked at some traces, and Shaggy spotted
> something very important. CIFS was rereading a page in one case in
> which it did not need to,
28 matches
Mail list logo
