[cifs-protocol] 113102410891258 explanation on note MS-NRPC.pdf

this. Regards, Sreekanth Nadendla Microsoft Windows Open Specifications -Original Message- From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:m...@samba.org] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 3:43 AM To: Interoperability Documentation Help; cifs-proto...@samba.org Subject: explanation on note MS-NRPC.pdf

[cifs-protocol] 113100910848314 session logoff request / response clarification

. As mentioned, Access Denied is the expected error and the server MAY disconnect the connection. Note that Windows servers do not disconnect due to mismatched signature. This is true for any request that fails signature verification. Regards, Sreekanth Nadendla Microsoft Windows Open Specifications

[cifs-protocol] [REG:113100910848319] [MS-SMB2]Q 2 of 3: Does the client behaviour stated in section 3.2.5.4 (Receiving an SMB2 LOGOFF Response) apply in case of an error as well?

Hello Shirish, I am the engineer who will be working with you on this issue. I am currently researching the problem and will provide you with an update soon. Regards, Sreekanth Nadendla Microsoft Windows Open Specifications -Original Message- From: Bryan Burgin

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:113100910848314]] [MS-SMB2] Q 1 of 3: Types of error a server can return in response to a session logoff request from a client (section 2.2.8).

Hello Shirish, I am the engineer who will be working with you on this issue. I am currently researching the problem and will provide you with an update soon. Regards, Sreekanth Nadendla Microsoft Windows Open Specifications -Original Message- From: Bryan Burgin

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:113100910848322] [MS-SMB2] Q 3 of 3: behaviour if the signature verification fails in section 3.2.5.1.3

Hello Shirish, I am the engineer who will be working with you on this issue. I am currently researching the problem and will provide you with an update soon. Regards, Sreekanth Nadendla Microsoft Windows Open Specifications -Original Message- From: Bryan Burgin

[cifs-protocol] 112080853508014 SMB3 channel sequence

112080855623402 SMB3 channel sequence questions. Channel sequence get out of sync ? if overflow results during idle file handle, can server detect ? Regards, Sreekanth Nadendla Microsoft Windows Open Specifications -Original Message- From: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher [mailto:me

[cifs-protocol] 112080864018345 SMB3 encryption over multiple requests

Hello Stefan, Thank you for your inquiry about encryption in SMB3 file sharing protocol. We have created incident 112080864018345 for investigating this issue. One of the Open specifications team member will contact you shortly. Regards, Sreekanth Nadendla Microsoft Windows

[cifs-protocol] 112053067163367 handle based permission checks in SMB1?

Hello Volker, Incident number for tracking the SMB2 question is 112053067163367. Regards, Sreekanth Nadendla Microsoft Windows Open Specifications -Original Message- From: Sreekanth Nadendla Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 11:31 PM To: volker.lende...@sernet.de Cc

Re: [cifs-protocol] 112050346749387 handle based permission checks in SMB1?

Hello Volker, I will create a new incident for SMB2 and let you know the incident number tomorrow. Regards, Sreekanth From: Volker Lendecke [volker.lende...@sernet.de] Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 11:10 PM To: Sreekanth Nadendla Cc

Re: [cifs-protocol] 112050346749387 handle based permission checks in SMB1?

Hello Volker, Our product group is investigating this issue closely. I will provide you an update as soon as we conclude our review. Thank you for being patient. Regards, Sreekanth Nadendla Microsoft Windows Open Specifications -Original Message- From: Volker

[cifs-protocol] 112050346749387 handle based permission checks in SMB1?

[Adding case mail to cc. Removed dochelp, Incident ID in subject] Hello Volker, I am the engineer who will be working with you on this issue. I am currently researching the problem and will provide you with an update soon. Regards, Sreekanth Nadendla Microsoft Windows

Re: [cifs-protocol] When will clients/applications do a smb2 session reauth

Hello Stefan, Thank you for your inquiry about file sharing protocols. One of the Open specifications team member will contact you soon. Regards, Sreekanth Nadendla Microsoft Windows Open Specifications -Original Message- From: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher

Re: [cifs-protocol] SMB1 -- proper client behavior when it does not hold an oplock

Hello Jeff, Thank you for your inquiry about File sharing protocols. One of the Open specifications team member will contact you soon. Regards, Sreekanth Nadendla Microsoft Windows Open Specifications -Original Message- From: Jeff Layton [mailto:jlay...@poochiereds.net

Re: [cifs-protocol] [MS-CIFS] Trans2FindFirst/FindNext

Hello Gordon Ross, Thank you for your inquiry about [MS-CIFS] protocol. One of the Open specifications team member will contact you shortly. Regards, Sreekanth Nadendla Microsoft Windows Open Specifications Email: srena...@microsoft.com -Original Message