ase Email; cifs-proto...@samba.org
> Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111061070310825] RE: [MS-PCCRC]: Handling
> of multi-range Range: headers is undefined.
>
> Obaid,
>
> I have a concern about the wording of the sample text your team provided.
>
> It is not necessary
21, 2011 8:59 PM
> To: Obaid Farooqi
> Cc: t...@ubiqx.com; MSSolve Case Email; cifs-proto...@samba.org
> Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111061070310825] RE: [MS-PCCRC]: Handling
> of multi-range Range: headers is undefined.
>
> Obaid,
>
> I have a concern about the wording o
-protocol] [REG:111061070310825] RE: [MS-PCCRC]: Handling of
multi-range Range: headers is undefined.
Obaid,
I have a concern about the wording of the sample text your team provided.
It is not necessary for the Branchcache content information format to support
multi-range requests. The response to a
Obaid,
I have a concern about the wording of the sample text your team provided.
It is not necessary for the Branchcache content information format
to support multi-range requests. The response to a multi-range request
could clearly be sent as separate content information messages in a
multi-
Hi Chris:
We have finished our investigation on your question regarding the response to a
multi-range request.
I discussed the issue with product group and here is what they think is the
proper answer.
"The BranchCache content information format does not support multi-range
requests therefor
