Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] RE: SystemLibraryDTC

2011-11-14 Thread Hongwei Sun
Andrew, After reviewing code, we confirmed that this fixed session key are used by some SAMR/LSAD RPC functions. We are working on updating all the related documents. When they are available , I will let you know. Thanks! Hongwei -Original Message- From: Andrew Bartlett

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] RE: SystemLibraryDTC

2011-11-14 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 03:56 +, Hongwei Sun wrote: Andrew, After reviewing code, we confirmed that this fixed session key are used by some SAMR/LSAD RPC functions. We are working on updating all the related documents. When they are available , I will let you know. Thanks! Now would

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] RE: SystemLibraryDTC

2011-10-21 Thread Hongwei Sun
Andrew, I am working with multiple product teams and we want to understand the scenario better. I searched and found some logs from Samba site regarding this issue as below: 06/01/06 12:37:21 vl abartlet_: Can you tell me the story about SystemLibraryDTC? 06/01/06 12:37:32 vl What is that

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] RE: SystemLibraryDTC

2011-10-21 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 22:58 +, Hongwei Sun wrote: Andrew, I am working with multiple product teams and we want to understand the scenario better. I searched and found some logs from Samba site regarding this issue as below: 06/01/06 12:37:21 vl abartlet_: Can you tell me the

[cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] RE: SystemLibraryDTC

2011-10-18 Thread Hongwei Sun
Andrew, I confirmed that the fixed session key SystemLibraryDTC is only used by NTLM when the client and server are both on the same machine. This type of loopback behavior doesn't affect interoperability and thus is not covered by the protocol documentation. Please let me know if you