Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112042860618701] SMB1 -- proper client behavior when it does not hold an oplock

2012-05-22 Thread Jeff Layton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 21 May 2012 21:13:21 + Obaid Farooqi oba...@microsoft.com wrote: Hi Jeff: Please let me know if my response answered your question. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112042860618701] SMB1 -- proper client behavior when it does not hold an oplock

2012-05-21 Thread Obaid Farooqi
Hi Jeff: Please let me know if my response answered your question. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at nkang at Microsoft dot com

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112042860618701] SMB1 -- proper client behavior when it does not hold an oplock

2012-05-15 Thread Obaid Farooqi
Hi Jeff: The SMB protocols do not have any specific requirement as to how much or how little caching is allowed on the client side. An implementation could very well choose to batch writes for a short period of time even in the absence of an oplock/lease. However, then there are no data

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:112042860618701] SMB1 -- proper client behavior when it does not hold an oplock

2012-04-30 Thread Obaid Farooqi
Hi Jeff: I'll help you with this issue and will be in touch as soon as I have an answer. Regards, Obaid Farooqi Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at nkang at