Re: [cifs-protocol] 112092556662141] FRS questions

2012-11-05 Thread Matthieu Patou
On 10/30/2012 11:03 PM, Tarun Chopra wrote: Hi Matthieu Regarding your follow up query Just to be sure, the CO_FLAG_INSTALL_INCOMPLETE is set in the windows implementation of the protocol as it's not transmitted to the upstream there is no obligation for alternative implementation ? -- Yes,

Re: [cifs-protocol] 112092556662141] FRS questions

2012-10-31 Thread Tarun Chopra
Hi Matthieu Regarding your follow up query Just to be sure, the CO_FLAG_INSTALL_INCOMPLETE is set in the windows implementation of the protocol as it's not transmitted to the upstream there is no obligation for alternative implementation ? -- Yes, CO_FLAG_INSTALL_INCOMPLETE is not sent to

Re: [cifs-protocol] 112092556662141] FRS questions

2012-10-19 Thread Tarun Chopra
Hi Matthieu Thanks for your inputs. Yes, we are working on documenting the behavior and will update once document gets an update. Regarding this Just to be sure so if the upstream set the flag indicating that the update is done the downstream partner will send the CMD_REMOTE_CO_DONE with the

Re: [cifs-protocol] 112092556662141] FRS questions

2012-10-18 Thread Matthieu Patou
On 10/12/2012 08:41 AM, Tarun Chopra wrote: Hi Matthieu : Would like to check if you have any further query on this issue. -Original Message- From: Tarun Chopra Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 9:10 AM To: 'm...@samba.org' Cc: MSSolve Case Email Subject: RE: 112092556662141] FRS questions