[cifs-protocol] [REG:120080321001822] LDAP connections have hard timelimit of one hour?

2020-08-03 Thread Bryan Burgin via cifs-protocol
Hi Stefan, Thank you for the question. We created SR 120080321001822 To track this issue. An engineer will contact you soon. Bryan -Original Message- From: Stefan Metzmacher Sent: Monday, August 3, 2020 7:54 AM To: Interoperability Documentation Help Cc: cifs-protocol@lists.samba.o

[cifs-protocol] character escaping in DN and canonicalName [120072224000698]

2020-08-03 Thread Sreekanth Nadendla via cifs-protocol
Hi Douglas, I’m researching this issue for you. Will provide you an update as soon as I have some details to share with you. Regards, Sreekanth Nadendla Microsoft Windows Open Specifications -Original Message- From: Obaid Farooqi Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 4:33 AM To: Douglas Bagn

[cifs-protocol] LDAP connections have hard timelimit of one hour?

2020-08-03 Thread Stefan Metzmacher via cifs-protocol
Hi DocHelp, I just debugged a problem where a Windows AD DC send the following message after exactly 1 hour: LDAPMessage extendedResp(0) (The server has timed out this connection) messageID: 0 protocolOp: extendedResp (24) extendedResp resultCode: unavailable (52) matche