Hello Sreekanth,
below is the answer to your question #6. Let me know your thoughts.
Thanks for the response!
Please note that section 3.2.4.3.5 did not say MUST. It only uses SHOULD. Also,
the wording of the section does NOT imply that when requesting durable handle,
one cannot request ha
Hi Jeff,
I didn't see a response to my previous request. It's not clear to us what you
are looking for here. Having a single netname for multiple nodes sounds similar
to a SOFS configuration. We use DNS to enumerate the IP addresses.
Windows uses witness for the following:
- If networki
Hi Kristian,
With regard to your 11th question (quoted below), I've done code research and
the server only compares against one ServerGlobalName, but it does strip the
domain of the client-provided cluster netname when making the comparison to the
value present on the server. This would make
Hi Sreekanth,
section "3.3.5.9.10 Handling the SMB2_CREATE_DURABLE_HANDLE_REQUEST_V2 Create
Context" has following text
If the SMB2_DHANDLE_FLAG_PERSISTENT bit is set in the Flags field of the
request, TreeConnect.Share.IsCA is TRUE, and Connection.ServerCapabilities
includes SMB2_GLOBAL_CAP
Am 11.12.23 um 22:15 schrieb Kristian Smith:
Hi Metze,
I'm reaching out with regard to question 10 from your mail below.
-
Question 10:
MS-SWM 3.1.6.1 Server Application Notifies of an Interf
Hi Metze,
I don't think I'll be able to get answers to your follow-ups before I'm
out-of-office tomorrow evening. I'm happy to get back in touch with you when I
return the week of the 23rd, or I can have one of my colleagues look into these
while I'm away. Just let me know if these are more urg
[BCC dochelp]
Hi Stefan
Since Kristian will be out of office until after Jan 23, 2024. We went ahead
and create SR Case - TrackingID#2401040040013236. Do leave this tag in the
Subject line for future reference and tracking.
One of our engineers will contact you shortly.
Hung-Chun Yu
hu...@mic
