Re: [cifs-protocol] [MS-NRPC] DCERPC_NCA_S_FAULT_INVALID_TAG returned instead of STATUS_INVALID_LEVEL - TrackingID#2307200040007944

2023-09-08 Thread Stefan Metzmacher via cifs-protocol
Hi Jeff, We have updated [MS-NRPC] for the next release to address this issue. We have added the following Behavior Note to section 3.5.4.4.10: <197> Section 3.5.4.4.10: Windows RPC layer may return its own error code instead of STATUS_INVALID_LEVEL. The error code that a client gets depends

Re: [cifs-protocol] [MS-NRPC] DCERPC_NCA_S_FAULT_INVALID_TAG returned instead of STATUS_INVALID_LEVEL - TrackingID#2307200040007944

2023-09-07 Thread Jeff McCashland (He/him) via cifs-protocol
Hi Metze, We have updated [MS-NRPC] for the next release to address this issue. We have added the following Behavior Note to section 3.5.4.4.10: <197> Section 3.5.4.4.10: Windows RPC layer may return its own error code instead of STATUS_INVALID_LEVEL. The error code that a client gets depends

[cifs-protocol] [MS-NRPC] DCERPC_NCA_S_FAULT_INVALID_TAG returned instead of STATUS_INVALID_LEVEL - TrackingID#2307200040007944

2023-07-20 Thread Jeff McCashland (He/him) via cifs-protocol
[Updated Subject and SR ID] Hi Metze, Thank you for catching this. We will look into it. Best regards, Jeff McCashland (He/him) | Senior Escalation Engineer | Microsoft Protocol Open Specifications Team Phone: +1 (425) 703-8300 x38300 | Hours: 9am-5pm | Time zone: (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time