Re: [Cin] Varied Standard Shortcuts AppImage version for testing

2023-10-13 Thread Phyllis Smith via Cin
Andrea, thank you. Even if the html version does not reflect a difference, your work is an improvement because it will have less errors output during pdf to html. I have checked into GIT already, your Advanced.tex changes because I needed to check in changes to Installation.tex for the location o

Re: [Cin] Varied Standard Shortcuts AppImage version for testing

2023-10-09 Thread Phyllis Smith via Cin
Thank you very much. I have applied the patch, verified the results, and checked it into the Manual GIT. And thanks for the explanation as I will use that to correct at least one other spot. ...Phyllis On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 3:51 AM Georgy Salnikov wrote: > On Sun, 8 Oct 2023, Andrea paz via Ci

Re: [Cin] Varied Standard Shortcuts AppImage version for testing

2023-10-09 Thread Андрей Спицын via Cin
Hello Andrea and Phyllis! I see only one difference from other tables - all tables start with "\begin{longtable}[h]{>{\bfseries}p{...". The last two tables use "\begin{longtable}[h] { | p{...". There is nothing wrong from the latex side. Except the [h] is useless with longtables. It's better to as

Re: [Cin] Varied Standard Shortcuts AppImage version for testing

2023-10-09 Thread Andrea paz via Cin
> Andrea, I have figured out what happens. > ... WOW, Your works always arouse my admiration. Thank you. The git repository is taken care of by Phyllis, so I'll leave it to her to apply the patch. Thanks also for the precise explanations. -- Cin mailing list Cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org https://lis

Re: [Cin] Varied Standard Shortcuts AppImage version for testing

2023-10-09 Thread Andrew Randrianasulu via Cin
Thanks for such timely investigation! пн, 9 окт. 2023 г., 12:51 Georgy Salnikov via Cin < cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org>: > On Sun, 8 Oct 2023, Andrea paz via Cin wrote: > > > I am not sure, the table is similar to the others in the manual. It > > could be the "multicolumn" command. It is used to m

Re: [Cin] Varied Standard Shortcuts AppImage version for testing

2023-10-09 Thread Georgy Salnikov via Cin
On Sun, 8 Oct 2023, Andrea paz via Cin wrote: > I am not sure, the table is similar to the others in the manual. It > could be the "multicolumn" command. It is used to merge the 3 columns > into one and would coincide with the fact that the html version has 2 > more empty columns. However, that co

Re: [Cin] Varied Standard Shortcuts AppImage version for testing

2023-10-08 Thread Georgy Salnikov via Cin
On Sun, 8 Oct 2023, Andrea paz via Cin wrote: > Andrei and Georgy, can you figure out what the cause might be? Perhaps I can, I have to fetch the manual from git and look what actually takes place. Please give me some time, I'll answer back about a possible fix. Georgy __

Re: [Cin] Varied Standard Shortcuts AppImage version for testing

2023-10-08 Thread Andrea paz via Cin
I am not sure, the table is similar to the others in the manual. It could be the "multicolumn" command. It is used to merge the 3 columns into one and would coincide with the fact that the html version has 2 more empty columns. However, that command is also present in the other tables and has not g

Re: [Cin] Varied Standard Shortcuts AppImage version for testing

2023-10-07 Thread Phyllis Smith via Cin
Checked quite well and made a lot of minor changes while keeping the information correct. Changes were made to Installation.ex as well as Shortcuts.tex and checked into GIT. The table looks great in the PDF version but has 2 blank columns everywhere in the HTML version.I have not examined it

Re: [Cin] Varied Standard Shortcuts AppImage version for testing

2023-09-30 Thread Andrea paz via Cin
Phyllis, sorry for the delay. I didn't get it done in time to finish before the new release. Check well, because I was in a great hurry I am enclosing the additions to the manual regarding the "Alternative Shortcuts". shortcuts.tar.gz Description: application/gzip -- Cin mailing list Cin@lis

Re: [Cin] Varied Standard Shortcuts AppImage version for testing

2023-09-29 Thread Andrea paz via Cin
> Andrea, I did not update the manual and thanks for actual user testing by > IgorB and Andrea because for me, it was hard to test. Especially trying to > Quit which was a lot easier to use just "q" instead of "Ctrl-Q". I am not at the PC this weekend; give me time to prepare a table with the new

Re: [Cin] Varied Standard Shortcuts AppImage version for testing

2023-09-28 Thread Phyllis Smith via Cin
Checked into GIT to reside at cinelerra-5.1/alt_shortcuts.patch, so that users doing their own build if they want to use the alternative shortcuts, they can patch the source for the 27 cinelerra/1guicast affected files. As part of each new release, I will create an additional AppImage with these sh

Re: [Cin] Varied Standard Shortcuts AppImage version for testing

2023-09-28 Thread Andrea paz via Cin
What a great job you have done. My compliments!!! I tried the appimage for several hours without ever encountering any problems or errors. Thanks. -- Cin mailing list Cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin

Re: [Cin] Varied Standard Shortcuts AppImage version for testing

2023-09-27 Thread Phyllis Smith via Cin
I will have to ask permission first. On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 4:36 PM Andrew Randrianasulu < randrianas...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > чт, 28 сент. 2023 г., 01:13 Phyllis Smith via Cin < > cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org>: > >> There is a modified Shortcuts AppImage version for testing on 64-bit O/S >> whi

Re: [Cin] Varied Standard Shortcuts AppImage version for testing

2023-09-27 Thread Andrew Randrianasulu via Cin
чт, 28 сент. 2023 г., 01:13 Phyllis Smith via Cin < cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org>: > There is a modified Shortcuts AppImage version for testing on 64-bit O/S > which is set up to be more in sync with what is considered to be "Standard" > shortcuts for NLEs.. IgorB uses these and prepared a listing

[Cin] Varied Standard Shortcuts AppImage version for testing

2023-09-27 Thread Phyllis Smith via Cin
There is a modified Shortcuts AppImage version for testing on 64-bit O/S which is set up to be more in sync with what is considered to be "Standard" shortcuts for NLEs.. IgorB uses these and prepared a listing of the alternatives as shown below. If there are users who test these and prefer the mo